Thread: 5.0 Rings

Originally Posted by Burningskull

That sounds like they would need to split them into Left and Right rings and give them different stats if what you say is actually the case. Which very well could be. It could also be as someone said SE trying to get people into other content... But I don't feel like one ring is going to make people do Savage raiding that are not already doing it for the weapon / armor / gear.

Splitting them up into left ring and right ring, though, is a pretty player unfriendly move to make for those who do savage raiding as that would mean your savage rings would also need to be flagged as left and right, giving more variance to what rings you need to get and making gear progression even harder for not much actual benefit.

I still think giving the third option in the 24-man raid is the best solution to item level, and while that doesn't solve your character screen complaint, I would venture to say this annoyance is something that doesn't bother the majority of players.

Originally Posted by wereotter

Splitting them up into left ring and right ring, though, is a pretty player unfriendly move to make for those who do savage raiding as that would mean your savage rings would also need to be flagged as left and right, giving more variance to what rings you need to get and making gear progression even harder for not much actual benefit.

I still think giving the third option in the 24-man raid is the best solution to item level, and while that doesn't solve your character screen complaint, I would venture to say this annoyance is something that doesn't bother the majority of players.

Not really. You could leave Savage as a One Ring scenario that isn't left or right. If it has better stats than one of the tome rings then you only need to get one tome ring. Tho I guess if I want two of the same ring Savage raiders might want two of the Savage ring so maybe all rings should be Left and Right lol.

Originally Posted by Cabalabob

I too am not a fan of the second ring slot, honestly I’d be all for removing it entirely but I’m sure there are people who go that deep into glamour that they do their rings too who would object.

I have my right-hand ring glamoured as the House Fortemps signet ring on everything.

More generally though, the glamour dresser does make it a lot more practical to glamour jewellery consistently, so it's likely that some people do glamour specific rings.



It's unlikely that they would split rings into Left and Right, because they would actually needed to be coded separately (and duplicated if you want to wear the same ring on both hands). It would be the same kind of issue that prevents us from glamouring mages' wands over staffs - they're classified as different item types. If rings were split, you couldn't just have two identical rings any more, you'd need two unique items coded for the correct hand.

It would almost certainly cause more issues than it solves.

Why don't you just learn O9S then? It's the easiest current fight by a wide margin.

Originally Posted by AxlStream

Why don't you just learn O9S then? It's the easiest current fight by a wide margin.

Because I don't want to Savage.

Originally Posted by Burningskull

Because I don't want to Savage.

Then you don't want 2 rings at ilvl 400. Simple as that.