What if DNC is SHOMHOW a DPS?

[InkstainedGwyn]

Can you please stop using this absurd line of reasoning? It's divisive, and creates an imaginary argument. The game is meant for multi-classing.

"This game is meant for multi-classing" says all of the DPS demanding that the next class be DPS or else. "This game is meant for multi-classing," says all of the DPS complaining that Gunbreaker is a tank, and not a DPS.

I can't even get 90% of the DPS in my FC to even consider rolling a tank or a healer, even though we have enough players to field three whole groups on our EX farming nights - they'd rather take their chances and get into one group a weekend since we only have 3 healers and 3 tanks, not even enough for two groups to go at a time. Tanking and healing "just isn't fun" to them. Which is fine - but it's in direct opposition of "this game is meant for multi-classing".

DPS queues say otherwise, too: 25-45m versus 5m, max (for anything other than alliance raids). That's a lot more than can be accounted for by the context of "there's twice as many dps as healers/tanks for 4/8-mans".

I have two healers, two dps and a tank at 70. My next 70 is going to be either a DPS or a tank (I think I like PLD more than DRK). I have no issues multiclassing - but I have issues in the fact that I keep being told that it's not fair that I want another class of my preferred role. Especially when it's DPS telling me to "stop being divisive."

No. Stop being selfish.

[Floortank]

"This game is meant for multi-classing" says all of the DPS demanding that the next class be DPS or else.

I main warrior.

Also strawman: I haven't demanded anything. I'm quite happy with what I've got.