Quote Originally Posted by Brightamethyst View Post
Who cares? Not knowing the reasoning behind someone's opinion doesn't make it any less valid. What's wrong with just letting people like what they like without requiring validation?
I've not called it invalid, merely unverifiable and implied that to myself and others it was incomprehensible. But, if not even sign or tell or a reason is necessary, then Mito's reply was at least as valid in its own right as well.

After all, It's been expressed, and at least three people at this time have seen fit to express agreement with it. If each opinion has guaranteed it one and only one opinion's worth of merit, then ought I count opinions solely by the number of irreconcilable conclusions among them, or by each individual's expression, redundant or not?

Why defend on principle any post that falls outside a given norm if it requires no validation, from you or otherwise -- let alone by calling out someone for having a conflicting opinion as if solely on base or controlling motives?