No one is assuming the fall of a game, I'm saying the backlash is something to consider. That repeating mistakes that a previous developer made is not the way to go. He took a step in the right direction, he looked at those complaints and he fixed what he could. This is a good developer. You know what isn't good? Going from that and then slapping a gender lock back onto something again.
We've just had our first limited class.
There is a possibility that we will be getting our second-course of limited races.
- It doesn't help that this will be one after the other that is starting to make people uncomfortable. I honestly expect Dancer to be female only at this rate if the sole reason that Viera male isn't added is due to them being uncomfortable about it due to 'cuteness'. So now we're going to have a bunch of strapping young lads dancing around with grace and elegance.
How is this okay? Because it worked with other communities it'll be fine in this one? I really do not understand this logic where something bad has happened, you revert it, but then you add it back in again and NOT expect people to think that was an idiotic move and not go 'wtf'. He is a smart man, I can't imagine this happening because of how stupid it sounds on paper.
He reverted a gender lock, the community thought that was the end of it. He asked for races, people voted Viera. The assumption can be made that due to what happened and how silly it would be to return to those times that male Viera would be included.
As for the demographic, no one knows that demographic because we don't have that data. That's just as much of an assumption to make than people assuming that a gender locked race is going to make people flinch away from it.
70% positive? Where are you getting that, where are they getting that? Don't tell me they're getting that number from how many players are active vs how many actually picked up the quest. Or is it an on forum poll where only a small portion of the community voted? The same argument could be said for the race poll as well I suppose.
If he's adding in a new race for marketability he should do what all people do when they're trying to make a profit. Advertise their product. Where is the advertising for this new race? We don't know, they haven't shown it yet. Viera was used for marketability right on time for preorders. Where is the other one? If there new to FF then the current races aren't going to matter; they wouldn't have seen those races before!
And while adding in a completely new race could be the better option, it doesn't look all that great when the race you're adding is supposedly another feline race when you already have one! Out of all the things to pick from and then, they're just going to slap on a gender lock on that one as well. Creating a brand new race is one thing, something that is new and unique to the game that a lot of people can enjoy, like au'ra. But to create a brand new race and then slap a gender lock on it is a new thing entirely. It'd be like releasing Aura again but only having one gender.
If they're going to gender lock Viera then I'd rather they didn't gender lock the other race that has no need to be gender locked. In fact, I'd rather have them not release any other race at all if they're just going to lock them.
As for the friend, no, they're new. They bought into after seeing others using that race and thankfully for them, it wasn't gender locked.
Sigh - I honestly can't be chuffed to argue anymore; as we just end up talking in circles and then over exaggerations on what the other is saying. Actually getting lowkey tiresome. So I'm just going to leave it as agree to disagree and the likes.



Reply With Quote


lol.



