Thread: Coming in Version 2.0!

You two go get a room. Sheesh, TSO mates tend to ummmm, continue to chatter.

Great job on this post Zets, and llenicorn go back to fishin!

Originally Posted by Griffster

Llenicorn go back to fishin!

SE won't let me!

Originally Posted by LlenCoram

SE won't let me!

I know this isn't relevant to the topic at hand and I know I am an awful human being for posting this, but what anime does this gif belong to? It looks vaguely interesting. I might want to check it out.

Originally Posted by Hestern_Nestern

I know this isn't relevant to the topic at hand and I know I am an awful human being for posting this, but what anime does this gif belong to? It looks vaguely interesting. I might want to check it out.

Originally Posted by Vantol

Nisemonogatari or its sequel/prequel.

Prequel. It's from Bakemonogatari, which actually came out first. Chronologically it goes Nekomonogatari -> Bakemonogatari -> Nisemonogatari, for the anime at least. There are a tonne of -monogatari light novels yet to be made into animes yet.

Originally Posted by LlenCoram

Prequel. It's from Bakemonogatari, which actually came out first. Chronologically it goes Nekomonogatari -> Bakemonogatari -> Nisemonogatari, for the anime at least. There are a tonne of -monogatari light novels yet to be made into animes yet.

Thank you Vantol & thank you VERY MUCH LIen Coram. I am going to check this anime out!

"Hold SE accountable"? I hope enough of us are mature enough to recognize if something is cut for a good reason. That being said, SE has been very cautious about what they announce. If they're not sure about something, they give a well-placed "maybe".

Originally Posted by Yrusama

"Hold SE accountable"? I hope enough of us are mature enough to recognize if something is cut for a good reason. That being said, SE has been very cautious about what they announce. If they're not sure about something, they give a well-placed "maybe".

I have received criticism for that statement before in the past, and my response is always that, yes the Rep and developers should be held accountable for their statements because like you say, they are careful with their announcements. Therefore we should expect that what they say will in-fact happen.

Indeed there are examples where developers have changed their stance on a topic without notice. So I feel it is important to keep track of their statements, because as careful as they are, even Rep make mistake, or leave things out sometimes.

Take this statement for example:

Originally Posted by Bayohne

We don't plan on allowing players to jump from very high places where the height of the fall would cause damage. However, jumping from the places where you are able to will not inflict any damage. As for mounts being able to jump, I'm sure you've seen the new screenshots that show the party of adventurers jumping about while on chocobos!

However, if you look at the recent beta roadmap that was released, you can see that "Fall Damage" is in fact a feature that is scheduled for testing.

I believe that players will naturally be vocal about features that they like or dislike, so I feel it's important to provide players with the information that devs have given on these various topics, so that players can base their opinions on fact, rather than rumors and speculation.

Perhaps the most important reason to keep track of their statements is because over the past two years, these statements have been building an image in the minds of players of what the final product of ARR will be. If the final product ends up being something the players weren't expecting, then it will once again break the trust of players that SE has been trying so desperately to repair ever since the failed launch of v1.0. It's important that players can go back to these statements and compare them to what is actually released in the coming months.