PS Vita and Final Fantasy XIV

[Elexia]

Actually, engines do have a "min/max" because it has to be able to push the hardware to a certain point, thus when you're running tests and tech demos you can see how much (system) can handle, if it can handle all that the engine throws its way = max.

You do only hear "run at max" in regards to games, but it's also a term for using an engine.

[Scherwiz]

Did you actually smoke something really bad? Frostbite is an engine and no game. It has no "max". And the specs are very poor 'cause Nintendo wants to sell it cheap. The CPU is 45nm Power-Architecture and the GPU uses something similar to the R700(2008) architecture.

I clearly said Frostbite engine, your specs are wrong, and drug free since birth.

Any questions?

Look, I do not want to fight with anyone on the Interwebs, we know how that ends.

The bottom line is I would support Final Fantasy XIV on any platform.

[Coldfire]

Actually, engines do have a "min/max" because it has to be able to push the hardware to a certain point, thus when you're running tests and tech demos you can see how much (system) can handle, if it can handle all that the engine throws its way = max.

You do only hear "run at max" in regards to games, but it's also a term for using an engine.

Benchmark and tests are not engines. An engine only offers features. For those features to do anything you need content and then they can either be disabled or the content scaled. Running a scene at 20 million polygons requires different power than 2 million polygons but the engine settings ain't changed at all. Same for physics, post processing, textures, etc.

Btw not gonna feed the troll any more ><)))°>

[vax]

Yes please on Vita!

[Noir]

lolololololol^

Square Enix should run far far far away from Sony, as fast as they can, immediately.

Maybe you are too young, but since square moved to Sony, they became a powerhouse and that was the start Of Nintendo fall.

IMO they started to deviate from masterpieces, when they stopped being Exclusive and started developing to many systems. I do not like that, but I understand that they want to reach and make more money. Back in the 90's, I used to chose my system based on only one truth. Where are square games? Nintendo. I will stick with them. Moved to Sony, that's when I got the ps1. I love RPGs, and they are the best at creating them.

[Scherwiz]

Btw not gonna feed the troll any more ><)))°>

Hey if you don't want to eat that's up to you.

[Scherwiz]

Maybe you are too young, but since square moved to Sony, they became a powerhouse and that was the start Of Nintendo fall.

Hmmm... and my character's name is...? I completely agree with you, but Sony has Square to thank more than Square has Sony to thank.

[ibock]

Yes please on Vita!

I have all the apps Vita has and they work great! Some form of interaction with XIV would be awesome. I don't think the actual game could work on Vita though, but I did hear something about XI supposedly being mulled over for Vita.

[neorei]

Maybe you are too young, but since square moved to Sony, they became a powerhouse and that was the start Of Nintendo fall.

IMO they started to deviate from masterpieces, when they stopped being Exclusive and started developing to many systems. I do not like that, but I understand that they want to reach and make more money. Back in the 90's, I used to chose my system based on only one truth. Where are square games? Nintendo. I will stick with them. Moved to Sony, that's when I got the ps1. I love RPGs, and they are the best at creating them.

<3 nintendo, but i think they're going to put FFXI in vita, if they do that then i'm game.