I mean I already did. By your definition, the definitive "nuke" class in all of Final Fantasy, Black Mage, has no nuke spells. You picked non-elemental spells as some metric of a "nuke", which is just flat out incorrect. Maybe your definition of nuke is just far off what the traditional definition is? A high damage spell. That's pretty much it. Been that way since DND in the 80s, and no one there said Fireball wasn't a nuke because it didn't work on fire elementals. I'm not really going to debate you on what a "nuke" means if the root of your claim is just a disconnect from common definitions. However, saying that 95% of Blue Mage skills is gimmicky or highly situational, to me and many others, is just a skewed claim being made to bolster your argument. I feel you'd be better off not even citing that number. You could make the exact same argument with the more accurate and honest "50% of spells in Blue Mage's kit aren't even damage spells, and it even goes up to 80% in a game like Final Fantasy Tactics: Advance".
Elemental spells in classic games are as "situational" as literally any attack in the game. Including basic auto attacks, there are enemies with high evade and or ridiculous defense where you're better off casting spells, so I guess literally everything is situational, which still makes your argument weak and bad. Also saying "You can't argue that" or "you can't deny that" is not a proper point in and of itself. For someone who fixates very heavily on intellectual debate terms like ad hominem, you'd think you'd be avoiding that sort of bizarre close-minded statement.
I literally never questioned that, again, you accuse me of putting words in your mouth and then are doing the same thing to me. At this point we both may as well abandon the moral high ground.Removing BLU of its situational skills, and/or making everything deal non-elemental damage DOES hurt what Blue Magic is about. Just like what happened to Black Mage when they lost their elemental skills just to fit the 2.0 mold. Stripping a toolkit from its very purpose is an identity loss. I don't even know how you can question that.
Saying "what do you actually like in that job, since you are okay with throwing a lot of things away to make it fit the mold?" is definitly not the same as saying "you guys don't care about BLU!"
That's the very reason why I gave people a chance at describing what they do care about.[/B] You definitly got my intentions and the goal of my post completly wrong..Do I need to explain the juxtaposition between what you're saying in the first quote and in the second? Claiming to be "just looking for answers" and "respectful of people's opinions", and then treat things like: "People who don't like the toolkit don't care as much", "People are entitled", "opinions don't carry as much weight", "people show they absolutly don't care about some aspects about the job that are key to it's identity" as inherent truths undermines the intentions you claim are so innocent.If people are fine with removing every aspect of BLU's toolkit, as long as they can play the job like any other, I'm sorry but yes, it does show that you don't really care about that toolkit I described above. That's not me disrespecting someone. That's me saying to others "your opinion looks like you don't care about what others might consider as important aspects of the job". [B]
And yes, I do understand that what I asked could be taken as an aggression, but when people show that they absolutly don't care about some aspects of the job that are key to its identity, and get entitled about the job as to say that "all battle jobs should be able to do exactly the same stuff!", I REALLY don't have to be kind when asking my question.
Because it did, and still does, come off as insincere when everything else you say undermines it and takes jabs at people who hold contrary opinions. Maybe you think tone and method of discussion is superfluous. When you ask, it seems it's because you've already made up your mind. If you really are just looking for answers you won't get the right ones by having discussions with an aggressive tone.Why do you think I was asking exactly that? I completly admitted that I had no idea what they actually liked about the job. That was the very reason of why I asked about it!
Dude, people's perception of your style of discussion as being aggressive and disrespectful is opinion, it can't really be wrong, regardless of what you claim your intentions to be. That's a failing on you as a communicator when you're in a public forum expressing your beliefs and claim to be looking for dialogue.You put words in my mouth. You got me wrong. You accused me of being disrespectful. You accused me of giving false information. I refute absolutly everything you said in that regards.
You also didn't contribute anything to my point. You whole post was just a big ad hominem against me and the way I asked my question. I'm sorry but being apologetic while making a SECOND post with exactly the same claims feel absolutly dishonest and far from being sincere.
You keep saying ad hominem, but I've always been focusing on the way you frame your argument, not you. Even still, your position is "I don't think you can like Blue Mage that much unless you like it in the way I think is acceptable, prove me wrong", which is hardly a position meriting factual debate because it's entirely subjective. I've never once said anything bad about your character, and if you took it that way, I apologized. I didn't apologize for how disrespectful your approach is. You claim you are asking for opinions and for a point to be made that is completely based in feelings, but then try and disprove them like facts because you can't or don't want to understand them. You don't come off as wanting a discussion. You come off as wanting to prove how your opinion is right, when it can never be because it's an opinion on a wholly subjective matter.
I didn't contribute anything to your point because no one has to defend their love of the class or appreciation for its different facets to you. It was arrogant question to even ask.
Then you shouldn't be surprised when you don't get kindness and civility in response.I REALLY don't have to be kind when asking my question.


Reply With Quote







