Results -9 to 0 of 34

Threaded View

  1. #14
    Player
    Ftail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    310
    Character
    Lilac Blackthorne
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Raikai View Post
    But then, SCH (with 3 aetherflow stacks) have 3 ogcd lustrates that heal for a hefty amount plus the faerie healing while it Miasma 2's the packs of enemies.
    Aetherflow needs to be used for more then just 3 ogcd lustrates. Before the tank pulls on SCH, I aldo and cast excog. That's one stack down, then during the pull I use Miasma I and Bio II throw down my shadowflare and make sure I use bane to spread my dots. All while weaving the oGCD into places it can fit. That's 2 stacks down. If you have 3 oGCD lustrates because you aren't using excog a basic spell to help you DPS more, sorry but you are a bad Scholar.

    Edit:This is compared to WHM which can just cast a couple of regens and spam Holy without worrying about their mana with Thin Air.

    Quote Originally Posted by EaMett View Post
    And miasma 2 instant cast is so much easier to do than holy 3h cast spam when mobs are dishing out aoes. In addition to this I find that holy spam stun can be detrimental when tanks want to make everyone’s life easier by stunning specific mobs.
    Miasma II has a potency of 100 and it doesn't have a stun attached to heavily reduce the damage a tank takes. Holy starts with a potency of 200, has a stun (amazing), and doesn't get reduced to 100 potency until the 6th enemy. It can also be combined with presence of mind for even faster stuns and more milage out of Thin Air.

    I have never ever heard a tank complain about Holy Stunning a mob they wanted to stun, this seems so far fetched it's probably made up. If that fool of tank does exist, does he also get mad at the Melee DPS classes for stunning targets?
    (0)
    Last edited by Ftail; 12-05-2018 at 09:53 AM.

Tags for this Thread