Quote Originally Posted by SenorPatty View Post
snip
I'm not arguing in favour of him, but his side-stepping is more for the share-holders than for you. He simply doesn't want to say "Our current system can't support such a feature due to how its coded." in any Q&A, as that'd look bad.

With how the current system operates, it's pretty obvious whether a piece can be glamoured or not is intrinsically linked to what roles can equip that piece as actual gear; the coding more than likely uses the roles as the glamour check. They'd more than likely have to design an entirely new system to handle it, or re-do the entire current system to support a equipment/glamour dual system, which obviously they'd probably only do on a major expansion, if at all. So rather than sound negative, he simply gives fluff responses to side-step the issue for another few months.