Results 1 to 10 of 35

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Yshnal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    711
    Character
    Nera Mistdancer
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    As another user said, the problem is not that they put these, but that they use unrelated categories so that theirs appears on top. Is that reportable? Nope. Is it annoying, selfish, and childish AF? Yeah, it certainly is.

    And that's one of the many reasons (or one of the symptoms of the real reasons) as of why I barely use the PF, even if I would like to help with tanking.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    Ilan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    3,057
    Character
    Kurumii Tokisakii
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Yshnal View Post
    As another user said, the problem is not that they put these, but that they use unrelated categories so that theirs appears on top. Is that reportable? Nope. Is it annoying, selfish, and childish AF? Yeah, it certainly is.

    And that's one of the many reasons (or one of the symptoms of the real reasons) as of why I barely use the PF, even if I would like to help with tanking.
    It is selfish, childish and annoying that people use the PF to find members for their static? Where else should they do it? In the shoutchat where people get annoyed the same way and report them for spamming or in the Forum where only a small part of the player base is reading?

    Avoiding the PF because people use it for static recruitment is like avoiding the ingame chat because people write something thats not game related.
    (6)
    Quote Originally Posted by Canadane View Post
    Good talk, all. Glad we had it.
    暗闇の力#7805

  3. #3
    Player

    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    2,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Yshnal View Post
    As another user said, the problem is not that they put these, but that they use unrelated categories so that theirs appears on top. Is that reportable? Nope. Is it annoying, selfish, and childish AF? Yeah, it certainly is.

    And that's one of the many reasons (or one of the symptoms of the real reasons) as of why I barely use the PF, even if I would like to help with tanking.
    Please explain to me how this is selfish and childish? Oh, I really want to hear this. I mean, selfish? Really? As if every 'non-recruiting' static isn't selfish to the extent that the party creator ultimately want to prog, clear, or get a friend through a particular fight and wants other players to join in. Bad choice of words here. Childish? Well, it certainly is childish to complain on the forums about recruiting, a doubly so for the poster suggesting that they should be reportable. I guess it's just simply impossible to ignore the long list of all the PFs, and clearly, common sense has gone out of the window if this thread exists. Jesus, this is one of the most asinine "complaints" I've seen in quite some time.
    (1)

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by KaivaC View Post
    Please explain to me how this is selfish and childish? Oh, I really want to hear this. I mean, selfish? Really? As if every 'non-recruiting' static isn't selfish to the extent that the party creator ultimately want to prog, clear, or get a friend through a particular fight and wants other players to join in. Bad choice of words here. Childish? Well, it certainly is childish to complain on the forums about recruiting, a doubly so for the poster suggesting that they should be reportable. I guess it's just simply impossible to ignore the long list of all the PFs, and clearly, common sense has gone out of the window if this thread exists. Jesus, this is one of the most asinine "complaints" I've seen in quite some time.
    you going to just ignore the entire first sentence and the part that says "unrelated categories"?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yshnal View Post
    As another user said, the problem is not that they put these, but that they use unrelated categories so that theirs appears on top.
    (4)