Results -9 to 0 of 279

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Melichoir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    1,537
    Character
    Desia Demarseille
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Iscah View Post
    I agree, I doubt they would actually add it rather than a feature that would benefit a larger portion of the playerbase.

    But people make all sorts of requests for things that are of pretty narrow use.

    And I'm looking at this from an "outside perspective" too. It's not a struggle I've gone through myself - but I don't see it as "attention seeking" from those who do. I've seen and read enough, and known actual people. I believe it's genuine, and not a choice (because again, who would choose to set themself up for the sort of "attention" they get in this thread?). So yes, they have a real-life issue, and one not of their own making.

    I can't quite imagine what it would be like, really. Some part of your identity that you didn't choose and is inescapably part of you - and people tell you it doesn't exist and you're just making it up to seem special.

    Does the game need to be altered to allow for it? Maybe, not necessarily, unlikely on technical grounds regardless.

    But that doesn't mean that posting about something they feel deeply passionate about is nothing but "stirring the pot" for the purpose of making trouble. It's quite clear from their first post that they don't expect any ego stroking out of this - quite the opposite.

    It's a big complicated issue but I can absolutely understand why people want to see more representation and recognition of what they are.

    This is probably not the right battlefield, but that can be discussed without insulting them.
    The issue, as I outlined in my post, is that the commentary set up in the beginning of the OPs post sets the narrative up in such a fashion where it does seem political. They may have their reasoning for starting that way (id Hazard from a lot of narrow conversations on teh subject), but it does not help their position in teh slight bit by starting this way. As I said, it discredits their arguments and positions almost out the gate as people will dismiss anything they say as political propagandizing.

    This gets even more complicated because another point I have pointed out is how both sides tend to suggest the science is 100% settled in their favor.

    But its not. At a scientific and social level, its not settled, though it DOES appear to lean more in favor of the 2 genders (masculine and feminine constructs) argument over the arguments of infinite genders. Is that mean its settled? No. There is much to still discuss and learn. And that of course will require us to cross certain bridges that are considered taboo.

    For EXAMPLE: Is Gender disphoria a mental disorder?

    That is a taboo that is not allowed to be fully discussed within proper discourse due to the idea that it would be dehumanizing to trans people. That feeling is often bolstered by the fact that there are, again, erroneous claims citing that the science is settled and its not a mental disorder, often equating it to sexuality, and therefore above reproach and scrutiny. Anyone whos in pursuit of knowledge should know that no subject should ever be above question. However, as more data comes out, there are issues with that position that cannot be easily explained. We could get to the serious heart of something and settle things once and for all IF we have the uncomfortable conversations and research into these things. But again, politics and social issues complicate the issue making that untenable.

    Thats why I say that in regards to this conversation, nuance is heavily lacking.

    Going back to how this relates to the issue at hand, you essentially have to broad camps: One side claims its an integral part of their existence and that it is offensive to question it, the other side claims that its nonsense and politically/socially motivated. So when one side advocates (usually in a hostile format as of late) for things like "Non Binary options", the other side sees it as a political push. Hence the issues.

    Again, I must reiterate, nuance and courtesy for someone elses position, as well as an open mind in both directions, would go a loooong way in this discussion. Problem is, Im not seeing it, and I wont hold my breath expecting it to come.
    (12)
    Last edited by Melichoir; 10-16-2018 at 04:42 AM.

Tags for this Thread