How would an optional, official parser be toxic?

[Sneakaboo]

In most countries this is not an offensive term and can be used, I do not imply that people that disagree with me have a disability.
I do imply that some people overreact on these forums when the discussion parsers is being brought up.
While I respect your point of view the term doesn't mean that in most countries, if you consider it to be offensive you might want to reconsider quoting it.
Currently there is a trend going on where every thing is offensive and every one feels victimized.
If a moderator considers it to break the forum code they can remove it and I here by apologize. Perhaps they can censor it in the future.
Anyway I rather stick to the topic than discuss this any further.

[TaranTatsuuchi]

And this is why FFlogs is Toxic.

Fflogs is a collection of factual data.
By its very nature it can not be toxic.

The people using that data could be argued as toxic, but other posters have responded to that sentiment already.

If you breathe you're toxic.

Oxygen is actually toxic...
Breathe in too much and it'll kill you.

It's also a participant in corrosion.