Quote Originally Posted by thegreatonemal View Post
So instead of making countless threads about how the devs should be putting the rotations in the game we make them about wanting parsers so we can do the devs job for them.

No one is saying that exclusion doesn't happen what they are saying is that it will happen more quite a bit more. If parsers become official it basically acceptable to harass people and openly exclude them from things justified or no. the only reason people don't do it as often now is how strict SE is with harassment.
The issue is people muddle harassment for everything. You have people in this thread, other parser topic threads and even tales of df that have claimed being kicked silently is harassment. It really wouldn't surprise me if those same people even went as far as reporting the party leader or other people in the party because they felt like it was harassment.

SE's strict on harassment in everything. Even if an official parser were to drop tommorow, that would not change. But you know what else wouldn't change? Their stance on playstyle differences. If people fearing parsers because now people can openly speak in a civil or neutral manner with facts about why they're getting booted, then that's on them because they're the ones mixing up legit harassment and playstyle differences.

This is the common thread I see with anti-parsers: they want to play however they like, they don't want to be excluded from content they clearly cannot do, they don't want to be told where they're messing up and they don't want to give people the choice to disband.

All this because facts would actually validate other people's reasons for kicking whereas the absence of those facts gives them leeway to act like they're not the problem.