How would an optional, official parser be toxic?

[MoroMurasaki]

And I disagree with calling it a coddle mentality. Since when is it coddling to want to reduce the chance of encountering harassment as a victim or observer? It's a bad thing now to want to minimise needless drama? What a depressing thought.

How does giving people less information reduce their chances of encountering harrassment?

I said it several times a few pages ago but I think the community needs to remember what harrassment is.

If you tell me I'm an awful RDM and that I should (in the interest of keeping it current) 'uncheck the play-like-s***-box in character configuration' well then you're harassing me and I can report you.

If you say to me 'Hey your dps is notably low for this level ' that isn't harrassment. The only reason it's reportable right now is because of SE's ridiculous rules against third party tools.

If you think both of those are harrassment then there is no reason for anyone to talk to you about this, you're starting from a place of misunderstanding and logic won't work.

So clearly you have nothing to say might wanna look up how to have a debate/argument. Do so before you reply to this otherwise please don't. But I don't have much faith in you this is the internet after all and someone told you you're wrong with reasons you can't have that.

Debate and argument are two different things. Debate rules exist primarily to separate the two.

Might want to look how that works while you also math your way to a flawless rotation.