Quote Originally Posted by SendohJin View Post
i don't know how everyone who is saying Eureka is not suffering from massive recency bias.

Diadem is HW Eureka and was done much less and completely abandoned by both the playerbase and devs. there's no comparison between the two for which is worse.
Sure, Diadem was horrible. But if memory serves well, most of the players reactions towards S.E. were more like "At least you tried".

The devs recognized that it was flawed, shutted it down in order to make Diadem 2.0...which was also a failure. But hey, at least you could gather ressources in it and get a better weapon than what you could get in raid (if you were really really lucky), so it was still better than 1.0.

During that time, players gave numerous feedbacks, many of those backed up with years of gaming experience, and well developed arguments on how to fix it. Sure, it's not up to the players to make the game, but the team could use those feedbacks to see how they could make the next content.


So, when Eureka came around, players got at least the hope that the devs listened to them a little and put some of that experience into this new content. But all we could see was the fact that they have learnt nothing from the Diadem fiasco and, and that's the worst to me, is that they are trying to defend it as if it was the players who couldn't appreciate Eureka's true worth...

In that light, Eureka is way worse than Diadem 1.0 in my point of view. But both of them are still terrible content anyway.