I didn't color anyone with any brush, let alone everyone with the same brush. The person I'm responding too called it toxic for people to have job-based preferences when forming groups. It's not.You're obviously to set the rules for your own PF and exclude anyone you want, but I honestly always found it shortsighted to outright stupid to exclude high personal dps, but non supportive jobs like sam or blm.
Maybe I'm biased because my boyfriend mains a BLM and is pretty amazing at that, but whenever we saw a primal-farm group excluding BLM we felt sorry for them because they just passed on a solid "going to beat enrage"-player.
Midcore players trying to enforce a meta, because they believe thats whats gonna make them hardcore or good (or better) at the game, missed the mark. You can clear any content in the game without the meta and without locking jobs out. (Was it UCoB or UwU that was beat with a non-meta-set-up, including a DRK, pretty close to world first? I think it was UCoB...)
Again: You have the right to lock out jobs, if you want to. Or lalafell. Or anyone who picked the Twin Adders as GC.
But to colour every BLM/SAM with the same brush, maybe because of bad experience or just because of stuff you've heard, seems rather unfair and, well, shortsighted to me.
Enforcing the meta, locking out jobs or asking for "no double jobs!" in content where the LB doesnt matter as much/will fill fast enough for when you need it anyways (so basically anything except Byakko EX, if you want to "cheese" it) doesnt make you pro. To me it mainly shows that you didnt understand that much about the game after all.
I can assure you: BLM and SAM can clear content in the game just as much as every other job can. And even a support-heavy bard will hold the group back, if the player behind it, isnt skilled enough. Its far more about the players skill, than the job - crit-buffs and mana-regens can only make up for so much.
Locking out jobs because you had bad experiences with people playing those jobs or heard things about the "meta" or how those jobs suck, seems rather prejudiced to me.
But you do you - just know that not every BLM/SAM is out there to waste other peoples time or decrease their chances of clearing fights. When properly played, they're pretty good at ensuring that the party meets their goal of killing a thing, since thats what they're best at.
If nothing else, you are incredibly imaginative.You insinuated that it was the developer's fault that people ostracize each other in content over the meta compositions that world first usually tries to enforce while everyone else tries to copy and follow suit afterwards. That's all on what you said, not me. And shortly after I had said that such kinds of logic still made it wrong to do so in my eyes, you immediately jumped to an ad hominem to try and get your point across...calling me entitled because you couldn't attack the argument and instead decided that attacking the person was far easier. If anyone put their nose into someone's business directly right away, it was you dear. I never attacked you first, I attacked the concept of ostracizing players because of the jobs that they play from content, and yet you took it personally for whatever reason afterwards because I found the idea of it, not insinuating you at all, as toxic behavior. Only after you had called me entitled did I follow suit by calling you arrogant afterwards.
Maybe not throw stones first, if you're going to start complaining that I'm defending myself from your baseless slander in the first place? I mean, there's a novel idea...if you didn't care, then maybe you shouldn't have been so abrasive in the first place. Did I ever state that I play with people in Savage not from my static? No, I did not. Point me in the direction where I ever said directly that I should be entitled towards random Savage players for their time and labor, find it, and you may have a case. The burden of proof lies on you, not me.
A novel concept would be to not get offended when the other person you've personally attacked with baseless insults decides to defend themselves from utter bs. You're not looking to debate, you're just looking for me to say that you're right and I'm sorry, but I don't think that you are and you can continue name-calling me all you want. It makes you out to be the lesser person in the end by continuing to do so.