

I mean, I kind of wonder if the whole recycled instance thing isn't just another part of killing the train. If instances aren't truly fresh, it makes the trackers a lot less valuable and further obfuscates NM spawning, making it much less useful to specifically target NM spawns instead of just submitting to the will of SE and settling for mob grinding.
At this point I feel like a better design would've been to get rid of the NMs and give you some other ways to get what they're dropping. There's really no reason to leave in a functionality the developers so vehemently oppose.




The problem is the whole design revolves around fates, just like Diadem. We tell the devs we don't really like them but they seem completely stuck on the idea that this is the best way to do open-world content (ok, I know Eureka is instanced but hopefully you get what I mean).
When Anemos came out there was a lot of criticism and suggestions of how Eureka could be improved:
People asked for dailies or something similar to Hamlet Defence - we didn't get them
We asked for treasure-hunting and reasons to explore and what did they give us? The bunny fate...
I didn't run Diadem much but the few times I was in it it was FATE bouncing. And with a party of friends, it was actually fun. That's why Anemos was anywhere between tolerable and fun for a lot of people.
Pagos rejects the concepts of NMs with how the devs went about it. You no longer have the one or two NMs no one can be bothered with spawning while the other NMs get spawned anywhere else (Pazuzu was the only NM in that area I saw being reliably spawned, and I've no idea if that's still the case given you can get his feathers elsewhere now). Instead, you're lucky to see an NM spawn at all. Some NMs seemingly can't be spawned within a single lockout. That's not a design that revolves around FATEs, that's a design that revolves around the mindless grind and occasionally, maybe, gives you an NM for your trouble.
An fc mate of mine who loved the social interactions in Anemos went into Pagos today. Not half an hour later he was out, swearing off the content and reconsidering his sub in one fell swoop. SB has been meh to him so far with Anemos actually being a highlight. Pagos wrecked that.




Point taken.
What I was trying to get at is that Pagos is basically the same design as Anemos only with a severe nerf to the rate of NM spawns introduced as a way of derailing the train. That isn't going to work; take out the NMs (or reduce them as they have) and there's nothing left except grind, which only a very small proportion of players seem to enjoy. If the train was such a bad thing that it had to be countered, then the devs needed to come up with alternative ways for people to play and they haven't done that.
I really can't see what harm the train did personally, it had people playing together and co-operating and it also helped low-level players catch up. It feels to me that the devs are either out of ideas or on such a tight schedule that only minimal tweaks can be made to content after release. Their solution to the train was relatively quick and easy to implement, but it has caused much bigger problems than the one it was meant to solve.


I'm sure the devs got pissed because entire sections of the Eureka Amenos map and most of the mobs remained entirely untouched because the train allowed players to bypassed the mob grinding all together, so thought they'd FORCE us to get acquainted with each individual mob in Pagos intimately and experience the content they worked so hard to make, even if they had to make the player miserable to do it. Maybe it's revenge, I dunno. They probably saw the train as an exploit like Destiny's loot cave.Point taken.
I really can't see what harm the train did personally, it had people playing together and co-operating and it also helped low-level players catch up. It feels to me that the devs are either out of ideas or on such a tight schedule that only minimal tweaks can be made to content after release. Their solution to the train was relatively quick and easy to implement, but it has caused much bigger problems than the one it was meant to solve.
![]()
Last edited by Edax; 08-17-2018 at 08:10 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


