Quote Originally Posted by Sidious View Post
Seems to be a recurring theme in your posts.

It's very simple. Blanket world merges suck, and the method we're getting lets us choose where we want to go. It doesn't benefit people who don't play, but why should SE cater to people who don't pay or even play the game?
Perfect. Blanket world merges do not suck, and I'd appreciate you telling me how they suck. In any case, you clearly didn't read anything other but the part that gave you a cheery feeling inside ("I don't understand.").

It's even simpler than you think. Blanket merges do not benefit players who are not playing. Neither would a free-choice merge. And coincidentally, neither does benefit the offline players.

If this was a true "choice" kind of merge, when Joe Bob logs in next year, he will be presented with a choice of worlds. He can follow his friends.

If this was a true blanket merge, Joe Bob would log in and find his friends.

[Victory Theme]

But this isn't a true "choice" merge. They're giving us the choice, which they could easily give to the non-subs. But instead, the non-subs are going to be used as fillers for the lesser worlds and never offered a choice.

Because you support "choice" merges, it is bad that people are requesting that the non-subs get the same choice?

So for the non-subscribers, you support blanket merges, but for the paying accounts, you support choice. Care to explain?