Server merge: Hidden server names.

[Niqote]

Eh, not following that naming schema. 3utai makes sense and all, but I think I'll stick with #7 for obvious reasons. Going to be a bitch to get everyone I know on the same page seeing as several of my friends belong to different linkshells.

And that truely does suck for you and many others. If only they would merge servers to even the numbers rather then making us all pick them again. Oh and add server transfer to make the few who want to move happy.

[Skies]

Huh?!
I think that the only problem with server names is that all of people will chose first ones, and when they will be full the last ones (maybe except for 10?) will remain empty as now...

Actually that most probably isn't going to happen. From what I gather SE went "Okay so we got about 8000 active players. We want about 1000 players per server, so let's reduce it to 8 servers, each one capped at 1000 players. That way, we get 1000 players in each server!"

Remember, those numbers came from my... Secret number stash, and do not correspond to factual numbers, but take into mind the proportions

[ChefKiyo]

There is no balance in names being hidden! If I can't see the name, I'm just going to pick server 1 like half the total community. That doesn't sound like balance.

[charlemagne]

This annoys me. I'd like them to name the servers now and allow people already on the server with that name to remain on them. This way of doing it is a complete kick in the gysahl greens.

[AngryNixon]

I'm infuriated by this shit-storm of posts that continue to complain about something that's perfectly rational and well explained.

No thank you.

[Asmeret]

I'm infuriated by this shit-storm of posts that continue to complain about something that's perfectly rational and well explained.

No thank you.

Herpaderpa.

[ChefKiyo]

I'm infuriated by this shit-storm of posts that continue to complain about something that's perfectly rational and well explained.

No thank you.

How is this rational or at all explained? There is no balance with this. Servers are already being claimed by the whole community from existing servers. What if said server is maxed out? I'm FORCED to then give up on my LS? My friends I've made who has helped me thus far?

I'm infuriated as well. Being forced to transfer is NOT my idea of rational.

[Teknoman]

How is this rational or at all explained? There is no balance with this. Servers are already being claimed by the whole community from existing servers. What if said server is maxed out? I'm FORCED to then give up on my LS? My friends I've made who has helped me thus far?

I'm infuriated as well. Being forced to transfer is NOT my idea of rational.

Its a strange decision to not have world names by now...of course they do have about a month to finalize them. Even still, I doubt the server pops are going to be maxed out considering the current population.

[NefarioCall]

I'm infuriated by this shit-storm of posts that continue to complain about something that's perfectly rational and well explained.

No thank you.

derp derp derp derp derp.
It's a terrible deboccle.

[Radav]

First and foremost the reason they're doing this is to try and even out the servers. Do any of you want to play on a server that's a ghost town? I'm going to guess that most of you will say no to this. How should they achieve their goal of more even distribution?

Is it really so important that you end up on your *insert favorite name here* server that you'd forsake people who'd like to have more then a handful of people to play with?