We need another Housing purge

[Hamada]

I have a question for you, why do you keep repeating yourself? You literally post the same stuff, post outdated links in attempts to back yourself up so you can get ego points from it, people reply back with their opinions on it, yet you are still stubborn and feel so insecure about this topic. I feel sorry for you due to the simple fact that you care so much about a video game. Chill my dude. Walk outside, taste the fresh air.

I am only repeating myself because people are making me? I mean if they do not understand what I am saying, I am going to try a different way to make it clear. So I am trying my best to make it clear what I mean. Trying to pull "it is just a game" is not an excuse to both act in an immoral way and a way that outright break an agreement when you first make your account for the game.

Awha, you said that before, i addressed it several times. SE not listening to the NA player base is a different issue, that is no excuse to break 2.1. Yes it should be punished. People that did that knew it was wrong, and did it anyway. They did it for greed, selfish gain, there is no room for defense. It is no different then the limit break situation, despite your attempts at a semantics argument in claiming it was.

[Awha]

I am only repeating myself because people are making me? I mean if they do not understand what I am saying, I am going to try a different way to make it clear. So I am trying my best to make it clear what I mean. Trying to pull "it is just a game" is not an excuse to both act in an immoral way and a way that outright break an agreement when you first make your account for the game.

Awha, you said that before, i addressed it several times. SE not listening to the NA player base is a different issue, that is no excuse to break 2.1. Yes it should be punished. People that did that knew it was wrong, and did it anyway. They did it for greed, selfish gain, there is no room for defense. It is no different then the limit break situation, despite your attempts at a semantics argument in claiming it was.

Nah it is different from the Ungarmax issue people that used it first did everything in their power to keep it secret, the ownership loophole was brought to SE's attention before the rules event went live, yet they made the choice to ignore it. No the players should not be punished for SE lack of inaction, they should be warned that moving forward they will be taking action against those that use the loophole, but those that did should not be punished for past actions during a time SE was not enforcing the rules. Though don't you find it strange that if this was such a major issue like the Ungarmax they would also make an extremely detailed official forum response. I do not think I have seen one of those yet.

I agree that it is greedy, and I will agree that the only reason I have multiple plots is due to greed. In terms of morality given the context this seems like a morally neutral subject at best, since the law in question (SE) have not acted on it. As you said someone even mentioned how to go about doing it and this thread has yet to get an official response and it is 37 pages long. Sort of supports the claim that SE feels this is a non-issue issue. Either way please understand I am all for SE enforcing their rules, I just do not agree with punishing a player for something SE was made aware of. It is on SE for not taking action when it was brought to their attention. Warn the person in question, and make an offical post that is states their intent clear and what they will be doing as enforcement going forward. By no means should they be punished or lose their plots for taking advantage of a loophole that the community brought up in the feedback when it came the housing rules.