Results -9 to 0 of 466

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player

    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    3,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Hamada View Post
    "You on the other hand want to punish people retroactively for something SE was made aware the moment the rule changes were announced. " I have no idea what you are trying to say here. Are you just trying to slightly twist what is being stated to make your narrative sound better or are you simply not understanding what I am saying? Our stances are not different at all, and yet you are trying to make them sound like they are, for what reason I am not sure, other then pointing out I do not like it and explaining why. SE states rules before the new wards go in effect, people exploit the rules, one person even explained here how you do it, so that is wrong, plain and simple, and Alleo said before such actions is rule breaking. I am not sure what your objective is trying to say we are saying different things.

    They gave an official statement:
    https://youtu.be/BJwPCxau7CA?t=334

    Yes you are right, I am very upset with SE, I am very upset they are not taking action on someone posting how to exploit the rules, why you think I am here to begin with? SE not babying the player base is not an excuse to defend breaking the rules. 2.1 is there for a reason.
    Correct me if I am wrong, you want SE to punish those that used the loophole to bypass the one FC per account rule right? I am saying that is unfair, SE should make a statement that moving forward they will be punishing players that are caught using the loophole. Since the fact is SE knew was warned about the possibility, and did nothing about it, so players should not be retroactively punished for SE's inaction up until the moment the decide to take action.
    (3)
    Last edited by Awha; 07-15-2018 at 11:11 PM.