Results -9 to 0 of 466

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Solarra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    887
    Character
    Sylbritt Muscadet
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 89
    I can see why people are annoyed by what appears to be one FC owning almost an entire ward but at the same time I don't want the rules tightened further because those proposals are going to hit innocent players far harder than the people you want to target. We already have reclamation, most worlds have empty properties and the people who were grandfathered need to stay active to keep their houses. If the people who own multiple properties did not break any rules at the time they purchased them, then they should be allowed to keep them.

    Instanced housing I can get behind far more for the following reasons:
    - No need for reclamation
    - It should be possible to have a much larger outdoor furniture limit
    - It would provide a much needed gil sink
    - Potential to put housing in desired areas like Ishgard or the Sea of Clouds which are not suitable for wards due to lore or story-locked access

    FFXIV housing is something that has the potential to be great, instanced houses would let players get really creative. I'd happily swap my personal in Mist for a private island in the Sea of Clouds or even one off-shore from Mist.
    I'd like to see more people enjoying housing rather than trying to punish players who have a house and making them jump through hoops if they want to keep it.
    (9)
    Last edited by Solarra; 07-07-2018 at 07:23 PM. Reason: That word-limit, it's still there... :(