Results 1 to 10 of 170

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Rogatum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Quicksand's Door
    Posts
    133
    Character
    Bunny Suit
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 25
    @Aviars, Since no one has asked you, why do you want the items to remain locked behind top 100?

    Quote Originally Posted by Louvain View Post
    Well, things got a little heated over the past few pages, but I'll just continue on from here about my main post;

    Personally speaking I think the best way to re-implement the old mounts/glamours/etc is by making them (or a variation thereof) exclusively wolf collars, possibly requiring several seasons to obtain (so you can't do a one and done type thing). This way players will be encouraged to continue participating in Feast without feeling the pressure to try and reach top 100 and without losing the overall value of the mount.

    As far as trophies could go...they could make a generalized participation trophy, but it wouldn't make sense to hand out specific "#1" trophies.
    I agree that is a fair system, It does not address the points Aviars brought up as to why they feel the rewards should remain top 100 exclusive. Which are;

    Quote Originally Posted by Aviars View Post
    People should have to achieve top 100 for top 100 rewards. Plain and simple.
    Going based off of that, no compromise that does not require achieving top 100 would be fair. Which does seem fair, as does your suggestion.

    @Aviars Out of morbid curiosity say I did say "Yes" to your question, how is that wrong? Leaving emotion outside as much possible.

    Trying to save on posts.
    (1)
    Last edited by Rogatum; 06-23-2018 at 05:35 PM.

  2. #2
    Player
    Cidel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    1,489
    Character
    Cidel Paratonnerre
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 100
    Oh look, another thread about old Feast rewards predictably attracted the usual biggest rebutter on the topic like Batman to the bat-signal. That didn't take very long.

    Highly suggest people just don't engage directly, say your piece, "like" what you agree with, and move on. The "discussion" will probably end up going on for pages on end with various strawman arguments, passive-aggressive assertions and thinly-veiled ad hominems thrown around. Seen it happen enough times to know, and its already happening again.
    (12)