Ya it would be a great feature. The whole idea fc members can be locked out of their fc house is rather ridiculous, the fc house is for the fc members.
O also I have been reporting this as harassment ever week for over a month now.

Ya it would be a great feature. The whole idea fc members can be locked out of their fc house is rather ridiculous, the fc house is for the fc members.
O also I have been reporting this as harassment ever week for over a month now.
Really tough situation and I am sorry for it, I truly am. But.....at the end of the day, this all comes back to you ultimately, for not logging in. These rules pertaining to logging in and losing FC leadership were known and in place before this event happened, so as unfortunate as it is, and as much of a jerk this guy has been and has handled it poorly, I don't see any rules broken.
Loss of leadership for not logging? Sure.Really tough situation and I am sorry for it, I truly am. But.....at the end of the day, this all comes back to you ultimately, for not logging in. These rules pertaining to logging in and losing FC leadership were known and in place before this event happened, so as unfortunate as it is, and as much of a jerk this guy has been and has handled it poorly, I don't see any rules broken.
Being held hostage in the FC because he can't get into the FC house to demo his own room? No, that's not his fault. That's the fault of the person who took over.
Considering actions the game masters have taken in the past to restore FC's to previous owners when the person who used the dethrone abused the FC (I was in such a FC on Behemoth a couple of years ago), I'm really surprised they haven't done anything in this situation unless there's more to the story than the OP is telling us. At the very least, the game masters should be able to remove him from the FC even if it means they have to demo the room first.
Uhhh that’s what was said. It’s his fault for not logging in theLoss of leadership for not logging? Sure.
Being held hostage in the FC because he can't get into the FC house to demo his own room? No, that's not his fault. That's the fault of the person who took over.
Considering actions the game masters have taken in the past to restore FC's to previous owners when the person who used the dethrone abused the FC (I was in such a FC on Behemoth a couple of years ago), I'm really surprised they haven't done anything in this situation unless there's more to the story than the OP is telling us. At the very least, the game masters should be able to remove him from the FC even if it means they have to demo the room first.
and the rest is a just a result of that...so....no one said it was his fault for getting treated that way. Can you read?
I did read.
That is you assigning blame to the OP for their current situation.
At no point do you acknowledge the actions taken by the new FC leader, actions that are deliberately targeting the OP if he is the only FC member that was not kicked as he says. The new FC leader could have just kicked the OP from the FC and this wouldn't be an issue.
On the other hand, I acknowledged that there may be more to the story than the OP is sharing. (Or did you not read) It's extremely suspicious that SE can't assist in this situation. There's no reason why they should not be able to remove the OP from the FC per his request.
Regardless, there is nothing we can do about the issue as players. It's something that has to be resolved between the OP, the new FC leader and Square Enix.


It sounds like you are still blaming OP for his predicament. So would someone (PlayerA) who was NOT a FC leader but was in a FC did bought private chambers and decorated, if their current FC leader or a new FC leader decided to go and be a jerk and revoke all permissions including entering a FC house, and PlayerA wanted to leave the FC because it is no longer a good FC but can't, because they can't demolish their private chambers, would you blame them for their predicament? I mean, in just the same way OP didn't know FC leadership would pass (which isn't the issue anyway) and didn't know the person it passed to would be a jerk, PlayerA didn't know having private chambers and a jerk FC leader could prevent him from leaving.
Last edited by Thamorian; 06-21-2018 at 10:36 PM.
Nice to see the community empathy hasn't diedReally tough situation and I am sorry for it, I truly am. But.....at the end of the day, this all comes back to you ultimately, for not logging in. These rules pertaining to logging in and losing FC leadership were known and in place before this event happened, so as unfortunate as it is, and as much of a jerk this guy has been and has handled it poorly, I don't see any rules broken.![]()


So if OP had an important issue that forced them to stay away from the game, it's their fault for being placed in a hostage situation within their former FC? That's what I'm understanding from your post.Really tough situation and I am sorry for it, I truly am. But.....at the end of the day, this all comes back to you ultimately, for not logging in. These rules pertaining to logging in and losing FC leadership were known and in place before this event happened, so as unfortunate as it is, and as much of a jerk this guy has been and has handled it poorly, I don't see any rules broken.
If I die, forgive me. I used to be a Dragoon.



Over a month and the GMs haven't figured out a way to get you into the room to clear out? I understand they need time to check into the harassment issue, but they should have let you at least move on if you requested it. Can't one of them just force a kick from the fc and allow you to snag any non-destructible furniture from the npc?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




