Quote Originally Posted by Malkria View Post
No, like I said I would report someone for harassment. Trying to silence a voice you don't like by claiming they need to present parser data to have an opinion I feel is a form of harrasment and as I stated intellectual dishonesty. Furthermore as I have demonstrated via logic, there are plenty of cases in RL and in professional settings where people make important decisions and hold opinions others find value in without having done or taken part in whatever field they make policies about to critiquing the works of others. To argue that someone must master something to hold an opinion is simply not true, and by societies across the world not held to be true. To argue it is true here is both a childish argument and a blatent attempt to silence a voice that is saying something you don't like.
First and foremost, even presuming an incredibly broad definition, it remains quite a reach to apply harassment to simply asking for parse data. Regardless, no one has cited mastery as the prerequisite for having a debate. I certainly don't require a psychology degree to offer advice. That being said, if my advice sounds wrong, misinformed or otherwise lacking to someone with actual expertise, I'd look silly arguing with them. You have argued with career Black Mages, insisting the job plays contrary to the standard norm, incorrectly insist Black Mage wants for mobility, incorrectly claim its damage is lower than the other casters and the only evidence you bring to the table is fifty random people from your FC.

People aren't silencing your voice. They are proving you wrong. Now you can argue Black Mage's playgame isn't fun, but that is strictly opinion based. You can't seem to separate the two.