Quote Originally Posted by Malkria View Post
So first of all, where did I say "this is the only way to fix it"? Second, you yourself just said that people who have extensive background in the field...but the thing is not everyone does. Roger Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert being one of the earliest examples I can think of, who became film critics at first because they were told to be. Other popular reviewers just doing it without an extensive background in reviewing games, who now run popular channels on youtube. So if there is a fallacy of logic here, it's on you.
First off, how DARE YOU for failing so miserably at providing an example, that you used the same person TWICE (may Siskel and Ebert rest in peace). Second off, while I'm not sure that Siskel had experience in film or criticism (beyond a review for the movie Rascal) before Siskel and Ebert first teamed up on television in 1975, Ebert at least gained an understanding of film and critque through Mad Magazine.

I learned to be a movie critic by reading Mad magazine … Mad's parodies made me aware of the machine inside the skin—of the way a movie might look original on the outside, while inside it was just recycling the same old dumb formulas. I did not read the magazine, I plundered it for clues to the universe. Pauline Kael lost it at the movies; I lost it at Mad magazine
Meanwhile, most game reviewers tend to have both experience with the games they play and have experience gaming in general. Again, do I have to point out the Polygon Doom video, how badly they played and how they got utterly lambasted, or do I have to point out the Cuphead controversy?

Quote Originally Posted by Malkria View Post
Well for one in terms of the game it's mounted on legs, second then that negates that BLM should be able to cast on the move with the much vaunted swift and triple-cast abilities, third setting up your gun on in a turret fashion on the field grats better accuracy and cover but doesn't keep you from booking out should the need arrive (such as the arrival of a much bigger gun like a tank). Plus the whole point of putting a turret on a mobile base is so that it HAS the mobility to move out of harms way...again, just like what I am saying the BLM should be able to do. So your logic falls flat, again.
The concept of a turret for the sake of gameplay has nothing to do with the concept of a turret in real life. Do you not understand metaphors or something?