Remove antiquated armor restrictions.

[Fairymore]

I request, that as soon as possible, all armor restrictions are void within the Glamour Dresser(feature).

Is it not the case now that when an armor piece is integrated into the Glamour Dresser it forfeits it’s purpose and role as an item to enhance the combative duties of a select job and instead exists only to be used for its appearance? Then it should be that any avatar that can wear a Glamour should be able to wear anything saved in the Glamour Dresser.

I was looking at several dungeon sets in this beautiful game and came across two sets of armor that looked nearly identical save for the colors. How disappointed I was to discover the set my job wears was not the red one. I became mad at the other class and how a job I have no interest in playing is given armor I think looks nice. Fortunately the feeling of frustration passed. I shouldn’t be upset with a job but with the antiquated armor restrictions in the game. Please remedy this.

[KaivaC]

snip

I thought that was the point of AF gear. Unique gear specific to jobs. I dunno....I think AF gear should stay locked to their jobs

[KageTokage]

Jobs should be visually distinct to a degree, and the AF armor is the main way they do that.

[Kayiko]

At least make it so when the AF1 gear is upgraded to the dyeable versions they can be stored in the armoire. It is pretty annoying that the AF1 gear can be stored in it but if it is the dyeable versions suddenly it is all nope.

[Emstidor]

You guys, OP isn't talking about the literal Antique Armor sets (recolored AF1), they're calling out the practice of locking gear with shared models to separate classes.

[Myvar]

Is it not the case now that when an armor piece is integrated into the Glamour Dresser it forfeits it’s purpose and role as an item to enhance the combative duties of a select job and instead exists only to be used for its appearance?

With the next patch in about 3 weeks, you can turn glamours in the Glamour Dresser back into items.