No. Full experience means full experience, as in being able to do all the same things as everyone else, in the same way. If you can do something once a week but another person can pay to do it twice, then you are not getting the full experience.
Retainers are part of the full experience because they have a very practical and important functionality. Even aside from crafting, they allow significant storage space, ventures, the feeling of "owning" them and probably also the spawning of them in housing (dunno whether this applies above the original two or not, but I think it does).
Similarly glamour, and that includes mounts, are part of full experience. Collectibles are a thing, you know. If you cannot complete your collection without paying, you're not going to get the full experience. If you cannot make the look you want, while someone else can, you're not getting the full experience. GLAMOUR IS PART OF THE GAME.
What would not interfere with "full" is things like increased experience items, cost reductions on teleportations and similar things that affect the time something not daily/weekly/monthly limited is done. If done within reason.
Now, one can discuss whether it's fine to offer optional glamour in the item mall. My stance is that...no. It's not. Either the sub or the optional item mall. I can understand only time-savers, like the jump potions or experience boosts. Alternatively options to redo mistakes on players errors, like restoring a deleted character or discarded item. Things that affect the game but are not part of it. Of course, all kinds of merchandise are fair game, so they can sell however many figurines, plushies, shirts and what they have as they want, it's fair game. So long as there is no bundled in-game feature in them...but there often is...for the highest-cost items to boot.
Square Enix always had a shady business model, but very good games from gameplay perspectives. And it's a real shame, because them having good games means they can continue doing the crap they do and they'll still get income instead of going down-under like any shoddy company should. But hey...people literally ask for stuff to throw money at...so what are the chances of that changing?! Keh.



Reply With Quote








