When eureka dies

[ManuelBravo]

I simply see my self is honest. If someone appears to be twisting things and make things sound better then what the situation is, it may be to blind defending or something. I do not see my self as "over-dramagzaion" I am just trying to express how I see what is going on, and I am not sure how else to say "You are just defending it for the sake of defending it without real rational reasoning. It just seems you just accept whatever is given to you. Such concepts are ok when it is a gift, however when you have many people paying for something, and you tell people just accept it, this is unfair to them. Thus this runs in why it appears people are simply white knighting. I may say blind to reflect the idea they are not seeing past "place is great because I find it fun" Such acts does not improve the game and without improvements you can't increase appeal to different personalities. Maybe SE can't do changes because servers can't handle having too many subs?

Talk about an understatement, being can't even understand simple perspectives of other people.

First of you should really think about how you response and perhaps step back and realize that you are dramatizing your responses. Just stick with facts and cut the extras. Express your self that way and perhaps you may get more people to agree with you and not feel that that your missing the whole point.

Second; it's not a matter of accepting what is given to you, it's more of getting logical response about new content. Think about it, many people like Eureka, many people hate Eureka, yet I think that for being content that has been out less than a month and thinking its terrible because it's not to their liking is childish. At the very least try it out for a month. Some of us have already almost completed all of it's current content, including myself, so it really is not hard, SE has made XP adjustments based on feed back. Regardless of what a company does their will never be a 100% acceptance rate on content. If you step back and look at the bigger picture all companies change based on feed back. As an example take relics. All games MMO's / RPG's have some type of endgame weapon. Over the years online one have gone from extreme to a joke. Why do you think that is? The bottom line, to make money. Some of us enjoy hard content, and get upset when the company over nerfs something that is already easy enough. Again every person sees it differently and are entitled to speak out. No one is defending for the sake of defending without real rational reasoning. Now lets look at what makes a STRONG argument;

A strong argument is a non-deductive argument that succeeds in providing probable, but not conclusive, logical support for its conclusion. A weak argument is a non-deductive argument that fails to provide probable support for its conclusion. ( hence drop the dramatization )

This is basic to any company along with terms work smart not hard. Just like in any other business a company that works and achieves 100% every time will have a hard time next time. A company understands is not in their best interest to add too musch stress to their staff, it's not smart specially for programmers. ( If you have ever been to a fan fest Yoshi makes fun of this during Q& A ) company that gradually works with staff and their clients have a better chance of survival. While the company will never have 100% satisfaction it has to gauge what percentage is being affected the most. The current housing issue is an excellent example of this. SE has to gauge, optional service, or expanding content. in another words a priority list.Changes take time, I do programming and the grinding ours to make sure to get it to run smooth is no easy task. So please stop with the needless stuff, if your going to express yourself at the very least express your self on your perspective and drop the dramatization in it.