Eureka Vote

[CryBloodwing]

I probably will not like all the dying and too many people that I can't see anything....but as a WHM main, I will be happy going around and raising everyone I can. XD

[Soupa]

Voted thanks for poll even if it is just an internet poll.

[ReplicaX]

Voted meh, as I don't mind the content, but there is clearly a laundry list of improvements needed. To which I've already posted in other threads.

[Metsonm]

You really shouldn't be aiming for a 30% approval rating for a system as involved as this. Hell, you shouldn't be aiming for disapproval as high as 30%. That's about 3x what I would expect.

[Anarnee]

I already voted on this from reddit. I like it a lot. It could use to polishing and changing, but I want them to expand this type of content.

[Alleo]

Still over 30% of the people that voted for that truly hated that..thats still enough and Meh its okay sound more like "its fine but not great". This sentence is a bit bad because you kinda can interpet it how you want. Those that will like it, say that this is more that people are fine for this thus they count it together with the people that love it and those that hate it will count it towards their vote. This is far from a good poll.

Having "Meh" at the start of a sentence does sound a bit negative for me though (as someone who does not have it as an mother tongue). Stil in the end we have a bit of a votes and only 30% of the votes truly love it and a bit more are truly hating it. That is not really that great imo. If you want succesfull content shouldnt you have a huge amount of people saying that they love it, a bit that are okay with it but dont find it that great and only a small part that hate it?

Honestly that still shows me that there is something wrong with the content. (And its funny that suddenly these numbers mean more than the forum post even though they are also still a minority)

In the end the most find it Meh. So kinda they dont hate it but they also dont love it. Not sure if you should go that way with content. At the same time this gives us no inside of how the people saw the option. Was someone leaning more on the negative side but did not hate it? Or was someone was truly fine with it but did not love it? We simply dont know..we only know that still the minority of people that voted for that really love it.

If it was hated as much as the forums might lead someone to believe, we wouldn't be having Eureka instances being near constantly packed. Well at least in EU. Obviously I can't speak for the other data centres given I don't play there.

That is not a good argument for or against something. First its still the second week of release and it would be really really sad if this one would already be death. Even Diadem 2.0 stayed alive for abit longer. (And that one only had a RNG weapon behind it and not the relic and that big amount of glamour). Second it takes people from all over the datacenters into the instance so it makes sense that it would still be so full.

Lets talk about it when its a few months later and lets see how SE reacts to this. They were at least more intelligent with that since you can go into there solo instead of having to wait till a whole group filled. But we cant tell right now if its a success or not.

[Vstarstruck]

Still over 30% of the people that voted for that truly hated that..thats still enough and Meh its okay sound more like "its fine but not great". This sentence is a bit bad because you kinda can interpet it how you want. Those that will like it, say that this is more that people are fine for this thus they count it together with the people that love it and those that hate it will count it towards their vote. This is far from a good poll.

Having "Meh" at the start of a sentence does sound a bit negative for me though (as someone who does not have it as an mother tongue). Stil in the end we have a bit of a votes and only 30% of the votes truly love it and a bit more are truly hating it. That is not really that great imo. If you want succesfull content shouldnt you have a huge amount of people saying that they love it, a bit that are okay with it but dont find it that great and only a small part that hate it?

Honestly that still shows me that there is something wrong with the content. (And its funny that suddenly these numbers mean more than the forum post even though they are also still a minority)

In the end the most find it Meh. So kinda they dont hate it but they also dont love it. Not sure if you should go that way with content. At the same time this gives us no inside of how the people saw the option. Was someone leaning more on the negative side but did not hate it? Or was someone was truly fine with it but did not love it? We simply dont know..we only know that still the minority of people that voted for that really love it.



That is not a good argument for or against something. First its still the second week of release and it would be really really sad if this one would already be death. Even Diadem 2.0 stayed alive for abit longer. (And that one only had a RNG weapon behind it and not the relic and that big amount of glamour). Second it takes people from all over the datacenters into the instance so it makes sense that it would still be so full.

Lets talk about it when its a few months later and lets see how SE reacts to this. They were at least more intelligent with that since you can go into there solo instead of having to wait till a whole group filled. But we cant tell right now if its a success or not.

We really need more people like your self that can truly analyze the situation. You even took what I was going to reply to Penthea. Look at PvP, the gero made a huge spike in activy and lasted all the way in SB for a bit. Once the SB returners got what they needed, the rush of desynth for gold ingots and a source of exp ,it completely died. This PvP rush lasted way longer then diadem 2.0 but it was still an artificial spike in activity. When something is new you are going to have different people at different times trying it out, then there is others trying to tuff it out a little at a time trying to get to level 20 before it dies.

That is the other thing people seem to magically forget that defend this diadem 3.0, people will play things despite hating it, for different reasons that differ from person to person. That will not have lasting activity.

Lastly when I say "meh it is ok" that is me implying I dislike something (undefined degree, differs by situation) but I can tolerate it. At some situations I may say "meh it is ok" to mask "I really hate it but I tolerate it enough for me to say I do not hate it, but I am not going to say that because I do not want to sound rude". That statement is def more negative then positive and no matter how you spin it, someone voting that is admitting it has a lot of glaring problems, even if they do like it somewhat.

Ironic that you say 70% clearly dislike when 1/3 or to be more acurate, 4/10 don't care much. where as 3/10 are more or less struggling to one up eachother on the love/hate camps.

I said "70% of the people clearly dislike it in some way out of 2600 now." there is no irony about what I said, adding is hard for you I guess, 39+31=70

"meh it is ok" means there is parts you dislike about something. With all the delays this place had, that kind of split is far from ideal. If it was some side content made in 24-48 hours it would be a different story. It looks rushed, because there is nothing there, no features, (like social features to search people, level sync, etc) and people/ monsters vanishing problems. This is what you expect being in beta, not finished.

[Mahrze]

I said "70% of the people clearly dislike it in some way out of 2600 now." there is no irony about what I said, adding is hard for you I guess, 39+31=70

To quote your own source from where that sentence came as a reply to:

from 1400 votes, 2/3 are fine with it. Guess thats not as bad as people want to make it out

70% of the people clearly dislike it in some way out of 2600 now. This is why you cant trust white knight skewing and spinning facts. The other 30% clearly do not know how much we lost content wise in the game as a hole for SB, for all the resources that went into it with all the delays, a buggy fate train is not an acceptable result.

It's a matter of interpretation. You clearly did shift the numbers to the otherside and called the kettle black in the same sentence. I don't know how to math as much as it seems you don't know how to read. But "meh, its okay".

"meh it is ok" means there is parts you dislike about something. With all the delays this place had, that kind of split is far from ideal. If it was some side content made in 24-48 hours it would be a different story. It looks rushed, because there is nothing there, no features, (like social features to search people, level sync, etc) and people/ monsters vanishing problems. This is what you expect being in beta, not finished.

Assumptions from start to finish, bearing all of your "standards" aside. You can be accusative and talk about how they need to step their game up, but make it factual and not brimming with confirmation bias on every word you write.

[ChandraNoctis]

You'd probably get similar results for any content in the game.
If you asked about crafting, potd or raids or dungeons I expect you'd get similar replies.

The middle response tells very little and cannot be counted as negative or positive - I answered there and I don't hate it, it's fun with a good group but not my favorite content. The zone is very nice and I wouldn't mind seeing more areas in future patches but the mob grind could be a lot more engaging. I like some things and dislike others.

Eureka has some big flaws but its not terrible and I prefer this to another snooze mode expert dungeon that is only really fun the first time you run it because it is tuned way too easy for current gear level.

[Ferth]

This is a pretty bad poll. I don't "hate" Eureka, but I don't think it's ok, either.