We need better comunication with the Community team

[KisaiTenshi]

Did they? Didn't see that. But of course I don't speak Japanese so if the fan translation I was watching didn't have it... yeah. Their communication is total fail.

Good to know it was mentioned at least.

This was the second to last slide of that part.

The live chat in twitch was going nuts about "how come bots aren't there?" , to which "ranking" suggests either there are not as many bots as people think there are, or harassment far outshines bots for action taken.

[XenoCranel]

This was the second to last slide of that part.

The live chat in twitch was going nuts about "how come bots aren't there?" , to which "ranking" suggests either there are not as many bots as people think there are, or harassment far outshines bots for action taken.

Not sure how RMT is 5th place when you see weekly (bi-weekly?) reports on thousands of RMT bans lol. What? Is this a blind eye approach from SE?

Unless they're bundling up botters in inappropriate conduct.

[KageTokage]

The live chat in twitch was going nuts about "how come bots aren't there?" , to which "ranking" suggests either there are not as many bots as people think there are, or harassment far outshines bots for action taken.

They'd have to be excluding those gil-farming bots from the equation for botting/RMT to not be occupying a higher spot on that list, as there's an endless cycle of 100+ bots being created, then eventually banned being repeated across several different servers several times a month.

I seriously doubt that harassment reports outnumber the bans being issued to those bots, so I'm honestly thinking they're just doing damage control by not mentioning it.

What's more annoying to me is that the same gathering bots are allowed to persist as long as they have when they explicitly stated that they monitor PvP bots for repetitive actions then use their behavior as a guide for mass banning bots exhibiting similar behavior.