We need better comunication with the Community team

[Alleo]

Yes, would be bad, I should've been more clear about this beign a possible criticism by a part of the community if they don't get what they want, as in picturing a worst case scenario. I mean what stops us from saying that if we don't get what we asked (personal we) from the survey? We won't really have any proof of the results and as you said we'll have to trust them, but enough ppl seems to me that they have no faith in it them anyway, and consider I trust them still but I'm kinda playing devil's advocate here.

We simply wont ever have the 100% safety that they are truthful and that the community will accept it but I dare to say that this would still be the minority of things and if they would be open about it then why should we not trust them? The fear of things happening in the worst possible way can be quite the hindrance.

In the end you can play devils advocate to every single arguement but at least for me such a improvement would have more positives than negatives.

And maybe people have not accepted negative comments from SE before because they feel like really cheap excuses.

[Remedi]

We simply wont ever have the 100% safety that they are truthful and that the community will accept it but I dare to say that this would still be the minority of things and if they would be open about it then why should we not trust them? The fear of things happening in the worst possible way can be quite the hindrance.

In the end you can play devils advocate to every single arguement but at least for me such a improvement would have more positives than negatives.

And maybe people have not accepted negative comments from SE before because they feel like really cheap excuses.

Wouldn't say it's fear, more about knowing that it can go that way, but you seem to know that it can so I suppose it's fine.
Eitherway it's fine by me