We need better comunication with the Community team

[KisaiTenshi]

Did they? Didn't see that. But of course I don't speak Japanese so if the fan translation I was watching didn't have it... yeah. Their communication is total fail.

Good to know it was mentioned at least.

This was the second to last slide of that part.

The live chat in twitch was going nuts about "how come bots aren't there?" , to which "ranking" suggests either there are not as many bots as people think there are, or harassment far outshines bots for action taken.

[Alleo]

Let's see how fast exactly the digest will come

Well probably still faster then all the patch notes that still miss the additional information that should come "later". :'D

[Hestzhyen]

Well probably still faster then all the patch notes that still miss the additional information that should come "later". :'D

I guess they're more than happy to take our money for as long as we'll tolerate being second-class.

I'm disabling the auto-renew for my sub. I'll have fun with the new stuff in 4.3 while it's fresh. After that, I probably won't come back until things improve. If they ever do. I don't like being a convenient afterthought.

[Remedi]

Well probably still faster then all the patch notes that still miss the additional information that should come "later". :'D

They still do? Oh boy.....
I understand that they want to prevent market abuse, since it happened in the past, but considering that datamining is a thing I don't get why they keep doing this

[Remedi]

Well still no digest, was too much giving a sorta deadline by any chance?
I'm not so strict that I can't understand some delays but a timeframe would've been nice

[XenoCranel]

This was the second to last slide of that part.

The live chat in twitch was going nuts about "how come bots aren't there?" , to which "ranking" suggests either there are not as many bots as people think there are, or harassment far outshines bots for action taken.

Not sure how RMT is 5th place when you see weekly (bi-weekly?) reports on thousands of RMT bans lol. What? Is this a blind eye approach from SE?

Unless they're bundling up botters in inappropriate conduct.

[XenoCranel]

They did talk about bots in the LL and also expalined their ban policies, as I said they also included a bot section in the RMT reports, which means to me they do listen, however they could you know tell us that.

As for their translation on twitter, well I was sure it wasn't going to work, hence why I wanted ppl to focus on this problem, more than where the money are supposedly going

Yeah, they put up an explanation on what happens if you use 3rd party programs. The slide was basically common knowledge for most and not addressing the real issue many players asked on the LL QA thread.

[Deli]

Well still no digest, was too much giving a sorta deadline by any chance?
I'm not so strict that I can't understand some delays but a timeframe would've been nice

hmm is this what you are looking for...?

[KageTokage]

The live chat in twitch was going nuts about "how come bots aren't there?" , to which "ranking" suggests either there are not as many bots as people think there are, or harassment far outshines bots for action taken.

They'd have to be excluding those gil-farming bots from the equation for botting/RMT to not be occupying a higher spot on that list, as there's an endless cycle of 100+ bots being created, then eventually banned being repeated across several different servers several times a month.

I seriously doubt that harassment reports outnumber the bans being issued to those bots, so I'm honestly thinking they're just doing damage control by not mentioning it.

What's more annoying to me is that the same gathering bots are allowed to persist as long as they have when they explicitly stated that they monitor PvP bots for repetitive actions then use their behavior as a guide for mass banning bots exhibiting similar behavior.

[Remedi]

hmm is this what you are looking for...?

I know that, but as soon as possible is not acceptable, if it was said in a week, while a long time for something that we should know asap, it would've been acceptable and if they had to delay it for some reason I could've been more forgiving.
Considering that comunications ARE a problem not for the quality but for the quantity, I seriously doubt we are asking for too much