Results -9 to 0 of 162

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    GreyJorildyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    500
    Character
    Grey Jorildyn
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by AarosLunos View Post
    IGN is all about which publisher pays them the most for the best reviews. Look at TOR for example. IGN gave that game a glowing review, yet the launch looks like its MORE dismal than what XIV's was.
    Not even close. I have active subs in both games and have done tor end game. Yes there's bugs, as was to be expected, but to compare XIV's launch to TOR's launch and saying the latter's was worse is far and away untrue. XIV didn't even have end game at launch, or PvP or anything at all other than leves. At least TOR has a dozen instances, with hardmode and had 8/16 man operation content and they just added another one.

    But if thinking tor was as bad at xiv at launch helps you sleep at night, have at it.

    Anyhow, IGN has some spotty reviews but XIV definitely was and is the worst in the series so far, if you can even compare console games to mmos in the same vein (which you can't). Regardless of best/worst opinions, it certainly gave the final fantasy title a bad name. Even Wada felt that way and stated it publicly. All we can hope for is they buck up and get the game to the level of quality expected of both a ff game and a modern mmo. The latter is key.
    (8)
    Last edited by GreyJorildyn; 01-24-2012 at 05:06 PM.
    Draw swords and shatter shields with us!
    Apply to Neutral Impact today!


    http://www.impact-gaming.us

Tags for this Thread