Eureka and further updates to it should not be or have been intentionally delayed

[CrimzunAeoun]

It is unacceptable that eureka was delayed from launching with patch 4.2. Further updates to eureka are now planned for subsequent .5* patches.

This is unacceptable because the development team is getting too comfortable with how they spread out the content. There is too much content split up into minor updates such as eureka.

The players are not benefiting from appropriate updates containing significant amounts of content. The development team has become far too lazy and there seems to be no communication from the development team to the players base when making decisions, such as delaying eureka intentionally.

This means with each future patch, in order to play all current content a player has to continually pay the subscription monthly to play content when it is relevant, this does not fit the progression intended which allows players to take breaks between patches.

Content should not be intentionally delayed further because it affects the players desire to continue playing consistently and any further eureka update should be reassessed and placed in major patch updates (4.3, 4.4) .

This post is to provide feedback to the development team that they have been making lazy decisions and avoiding interaction with their players in regards to making decisions about content and content release schedules

[Kurando]

The problem is you release too much content too quickly and players can rush through it then end up with periods of drought and having little to do till the next patch. They are spread out so that players get to enjoy all of the content especially ones that may not play very regularly but still don't like to fall behind.

The timeframe takes all kind of players in to consideration whether heavy gamers or less frequent.

[Ageofwar]

while i'm quite pissed this has been delayed from 4.1.5 I think it is better than the content is spead out though the patch cycle to even out the patch lull. The only people this disadvantages is those people that like to blaze though the content in a month then unsub until the next patch (which for SE is unhelpful)

[Pastahnak]

It comes out in two weeks, relax.

[KDSilver]

I actually prefer when the content is spread out like this.

You can focus on the one they release. Sure, waiting is boring, I waiting Eureka for so long as well as you all, but I'm totally okay with it and I think I'll enjoy it even more (if it's good of course).

It doesn't make me feel like I have to wait 6 month again for something new.

[Elamys]

I also like it being spread out.

Not the least because it makes the patch downloads smaller <.<

Also I'd rather they delay it then rush it and release it before it's ready. We don't need another Diadem (even though I kind of liked it).

[DrWho2010]

plus i don't think the devs are "lazy". they are always actively working on content.

[Wintersandman]

This means with each future patch, in order to play all current content a player has to continually pay the subscription monthly to play content when it is relevant, this does not fit the progression intended which allows players to take breaks between patches.

SE wants the players to pay the subscription monthly. I don't see how they want players to take breaks between patches. Fitting the progression intended is kind of relevant. They continuously add new content to continue the progression. There will be people with 2-3 relics before some of us even have our first. I am bummed with the delay purely because I find the relics to be fulfilling as I hate extremes and Savage so I never have a relevant weapon.

[Connor]

Just wait until it comes out and it’s diadem 2.0, this time with even more FATEs

[Squintina]

Spreading out can be a good thing. It allowed people to focus on Sigmascape Savage and Byakko.
Now that more groups are clearing faster, in 2 weeks there will be more content to use up their time.