As for my personal i've relocated that four times till I got my wanted plot :P Two of those was this weekSame on Lou. I kind of wanted to relocate my private large from Shiro to Goblet but the location i want is taken but yet we still have 3 larges left (granted not in the best positions but large nontheless) and like 8 mediums and god knows how many smalls - stopped counting after 20.
I mean technically you not wrong however that's a feature in an expansion so im not counting that as a whole. I don't see them ever require you being lv70, cleared msq or whatnot.
At that point that might just require everyone fullfill mentor requirements.
It was grandfathered in and for the new ones SE has chosen to let sleeping dogs lie. You, the people who keep complaining about it, should too.
Last edited by Mahrze; 02-23-2018 at 12:39 AM.
Kiiinda? Except, if you have a friend with an apt there, you can get into the zone and while I wasn't in a position on my alt to test buying a house, I can't imagine they have that restricted, provided you can get to it.
Not tried myself only really going by what i've heard. Ah here we are on the patch notes Requirements
Must be level 50 with any class or job.
Must have the rank of second lieutenant in the Maelstrom, the Order of the Twin Adder, or the Immortal Flames.
Must have completed the main scenario quest "Not without Incident."
Now if this can all be skipped then the whole system is a bigger joke than I first thought.
Last edited by Masekase_Hurricane; 02-23-2018 at 12:57 AM.
Wow, so many whiny entitled people. I cringe to see what they are like outside of the game.
You want a house and there are none available on your server....move. Understand this those that are pissing and moaning, the vast majority of servers the housing issue was solved for the most part. Remember not everyone plays on Balmung or Ragnarok, so stop speaking for everyone else in your arguments.
Those that were grandfathered in, there is zero wrong with that. In most cases there were tons of houses available when they got their multiples. Now except on the most populated servers this is not even an issue.
I don't have any issues with 1 member FC's but having a single level 1 owner is definitely suspicious. I think what SE should do is make the rules for ownership the same as those to buy. This would reduce the odds of a flipper sitting on a house and require an equal effort to obtain a house regardless of means use to acquire it.
FC ownership requirements are a joke and raising the bar to prevent abuse from some will equally if not hinder to a worse degree the progress of others.I don't have any issues with 1 member FC's but having a single level 1 owner is definitely suspicious. I think what SE should do is make the rules for ownership the same as those to buy. This would reduce the odds of a flipper sitting on a house and require an equal effort to obtain a house regardless of means use to acquire it.
If you say so.
I didn't say FC ownership. I said FC house ownership. Making the ownership requirements the same as the buying requirements would make every player meet the same criteria and likely put a crimp in the flippers as they would need a paid account for every house they wanted to flip concurrently. As it is now they only need one paid and can use lots of free accounts to transfer ownership.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.