Now, all the recent hubbub about how terrible the Garlean Empire tends to be has got me thinking, what about Eorzea?
Well, more specifically, what is and isn't criminal relative to the real world. We don't know a whole lot about Eorzean law, per sé, but details can be gleaned if you pay close enough attention.
Prostitution seems to be socially accepted. The dancers in Ul'dah are certainly not getting by just on dancing, courtesans are in Gegejuru's employ, there are a pair of prostitutes in Ala Ghiri, and so on. Brothels were also seemingly a fixture in Doma, and they remain active in Kugane (and likely the wider Hingan nation).
Other than that, and natural problems that arise from the Gridanians not really making their own laws, I can't really think of any major differences between modern values and those expressed in Eorzea?
Things treated as criminal in the real world are also typically criminal in Eorzea, regardless of whether or not people get away with it. Murder, rape, extortion, theft, embezzlement, assault, human trafficking, poaching, etc. Justice usually boils down to execution in self-defense, but that's only what we (as player characters and as players) see - there has to be a justice system in place, non?
Now, when it comes to wartime conduct, it has been argued that the characters and nations in the story don't need to adhere to any code of conduct and, indeed, don't have one. However, this is clearly not the case. Eorzea takes POWs, and as far as we are shown, treats them with dignity and respect, even going so far as to heal and protect them from lynch mobs. Not all enemy soldiers can be saved, but the Eorzeans clearly put some effort into doing so. In the wake of Specula Imperatoris, a soldier also mentions Zenos breaking whatever rules of war could be said to exist, further lending credence to the idea.
However, the Immortal Flames at least are willing to use torture to extract information if necessary.
In regards to the beast tribes, the Eorzeans are very clearly willing to coexist and live alongside them whenever possible. Prior to Silvertear they were on rather friendly terms with most if not all of the beast tribes, even if the latter did still live mostly in their own enclaves and not the major cities. Midgardsormr's presence wasn't the only thing keeping summoning rates down - primals were controlled passively through trading for the beastmen's crystals, a practice that declined in the wake of Silvertear. While the Eorzeans may disagree with beastman religion, they do allow it to be practiced - even the tempered are left alone, albeit oftentimes with a vigil, as long as they do not summon their primal. The Warrior of Light's activities, as well as the activities of others in the beast tribe quests, also clearly demonstrate that the Eorzeans at least wish to reconcile... whether it's out of genuine goodwill or pure practicality is beside the point.
The only instance we have of Eorzean aggression against the beast tribes is the Limsans breaking their land treaty with the kobolds, and even in-universe the incivility of that is called out. (The sahagin are actually the aggressors in their feud with the Limsans, having sacked Halfstone in the wake of the Calamity and taken the surrounding territory for their spawning grounds.)
There is a bit of racism and xenophobia, but it is portrayed as a bad thing, not socially accepted or normal. It isn't punished, but nothing good comes of it in context, and those who indulge in this behavior are not portrayed sympathetically.
So... what crimes in the real world are treated as socially acceptable in the Eorzea of 4.2 (and Doma too, I guess)? How are criminals tried when the Warrior of Light doesn't execute them in self-defense (or as a vigilante)? Thoughts? Opinions?