Please remove main scenario dungeon restriction when doing it undersized

[Vstarstruck]

I didn't say any of that. I asked would you be OK with it? I'm just using Eureka as an example because it's something a lot of people are looking forward to. I'm asking if something you WANTED needed to be pushed back or delayed (not forever, maybe just one patch cycle) for this to happen would you be OK with that? Even something you didn't know if you wanted but was planned for the future. I'm pointing out that resources being limited as they are, it's possible a choice was made and this was what could be done with the current allocation, AND if this was their proposed final decision then further resources would have to be moved to accommodate this future change.

Once again, I'm all for making them separate, but there will be a price and is it worth that price (likely sight unseen) to you for this to happen? Or will you, as many have, just ignore MSQ from this point forward?

It's extremely possible there's their, as you put it, "guy sleeping with his eyes open" on this and we'll get the results soon. That would be great. People would be made happy and the forums could move on to things that are much more relevant. SE making some announcement to this effect would alleviate a great burden on many minds, but they haven't. So for now we have to assume they are flying by results currently and will adjust as necessary.

This is not a thing and a starman, again if the team can't work on changing on MSQ while doing the other things on time, then the MSQ (including the 4.2 change) shouldn't have happened.

I am one of the newbie that enjoyed the change and explained why in another post before.

I don't understand why people call us ''white knights'' for defending this.

Because it is defending a huge nonsense and unneeded change. Defending a clear flaw with over the top statements = white knighting, like Krotoan. See their last post in basically asking "would you rather have more changes to MSQ or have something you are about pushed back"? if this is the situation then 4.2's change should never have happened as it is pleasing a very tiny minority. It only helps a select few once, you shouldn't be making a change with that limited effect to begin with. Because now I need to question, if they can please such a small group of people, where is QoL changes for those with disabilities? like this thread:
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...Sensory-Issues
It is really frustrating to be observing such a double standard.

All they had to do was teach people how to use the PF better, you do not force people to watch CS in a public setting, if you want a fast matchmaking, you get behind the fast clear too. You give grown adults choices and they decide how to conduct themselves, this is unneeded over the top babying that a player may only enjoy once (do realize not all new players wants to view them.)

For alts and noobs that want to skip unsync ( dont't think it is a majority really ....),

It is a bigger majority then people caring about these cutscenes. Proof? the queues got longer with less people in them. There are plenty of new players and alts that do not want to watch them over and over, thus you have people greatly disagreeing of forced cut scene speed EVERYWHERE (inn/ premade/ roulette) I do agree they should inform new players better about how to use PF and take their own group of friends if they want to take their time, but the roulette was made to give experienced people rewards in the rare event there is a new player that can't complete them though any other means. You could of watched the CS and go at your own speed before the change, just get a few friends to go with you that do not mind. But now they make everyone watch the CS everywhere? bad hasty change.

You are acting like there was not any other option to run then but speed running, and that was not the case. Before everyone got options, now no one has option, so bad change.