Results 1 to 10 of 22

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Mavrias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,071
    Character
    Jyn Willowsong
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaldaka View Post
    You miss the point: it's a request for an additional optional button, not a "QQ we can't read"
    You sure? Cause the part of the post where you complained about only getting one chest certainly sounded like "QQ we can't read"
    (4)

  2. #2
    Player
    Kaldaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    205
    Character
    Lutie Reingarde
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Mavrias View Post
    You sure? Cause the part of the post where you complained about only getting one chest certainly sounded like "QQ we can't read"
    Possitive. It was the reason behind the request - Also, not an intentional complaint, it's the cause of the post/request is all.
    Did I word it badly?
    (0)
    Last edited by Kaldaka; 02-08-2018 at 07:23 PM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Taika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,237
    Character
    Purple Rain
    World
    Sophia
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 32
    Even with that option the party leader could mislead others (by setting it up after people who have already cleared for the week have joined, for example). The best change would be to change the warning to show for every single party member before entering the instance. Then everyone will know for sure how many chests there will be.
    (1)

  4. #4
    Player
    Kaldaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    205
    Character
    Lutie Reingarde
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Taika View Post
    Even with that option the party leader could mislead others (by setting it up after people who have already cleared for the week have joined, for example). The best change would be to change the warning to show for every single party member before entering the instance. Then everyone will know for sure how many chests there will be.
    That's a good point, or people could "invite friends" but surely, if a party leader themselves or someone pre-existing in the group make up has indeed clear it, the button could be unclickable, to prevent the deception. Whatcha think?

    On further thought, perhaps it doesn't even need an additional button, but a tweaking of a pre-existing button. For example the "Loot" selection could be adjusted for the Savage portion of party finder to lock in max number of chests.
    In opposition, "Duty Completion" could be adjusted to where it's not about the chests, but essentially just the book from completing.
    (1)

  5. #5
    Player
    Taika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,237
    Character
    Purple Rain
    World
    Sophia
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 32
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaldaka View Post
    On further thought, perhaps it doesn't even need an additional button, but a tweaking of a pre-existing button. For example the "Loot" selection could be adjusted for the Savage portion of party finder to lock in max number of chests.
    I like this idea! The current loot button has no function, it's simply descriptive. It could be changed to "Full loot" button, locking the group only for people who are entitled to 2 chests in the instance.

    To be honest though, I don't care what kind of a change they'll make, as long as the change means that party members don't have to blindly trust their party leader and fellow party members anymore.
    (2)

  6. #6
    Player
    Kaldaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    205
    Character
    Lutie Reingarde
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Taika View Post
    I like this idea! The current loot button has no function, it's simply descriptive. It could be changed to "Full loot" button, locking the group only for people who are entitled to 2 chests in the instance.

    To be honest though, I don't care what kind of a change they'll make, as long as the change means that party members don't have to blindly trust their party leader and fellow party members anymore.
    Just updated the main post with it, as it kind of makes more sense to use what is already there, than to make something entirely new
    Thanks for chatting with me! I doubt I'd have come to it without you making me stop and think

    Added yours in too.
    (0)
    Last edited by Kaldaka; 02-08-2018 at 10:08 PM.