This is all DRKs get?

[347SPECTRE]

You imply that they knew de wae in the first place.

[Elkanah]

You imply that they knew de wae in the first place.

ohhh dear, you are right. xD

[Kalocin]

Someone did the math on Reddit and apparently the dps increase is extremely minimal, like 0.5/6% increase in DPS total lol. Paladins get a 1.6/7% nerf but overall are still going to output more DPS than us so... GG Square, basically nothing changed.

[Gemina]

Someone did the math on Reddit and apparently the dps increase is extremely minimal, like 0.5/6% increase in DPS total lol. Paladins get a 1.6/7% nerf but overall are still going to output more DPS than us so... GG Square, basically nothing changed.

I'm not that good at math, and play on PS4 so don't check any kind of fflogs, but isn't .5-.6% increase in overall DPS massive? For example, if the average DRK contributes 3k, they would now be doing 4.5k? I see .5 and .6 and think 50%-60% respectively, but I think you mean 5%-6% (.05-.06%). Just trying to clear up any confusion, coz I look at these updates, and I am seeing only a very marginal DPS increase to DRK. Like, not even enough to actually look forward to.

[DerpyCubone]

I'm not that good at math, and play on PS4 so don't check any kind of fflogs, but isn't .5-.6% increase in overall DPS massive? For example, if the average DRK contributes 3k, they would now be doing 4.5k? I see .5 and .6 and think 50%-60% respectively, but I think you mean 5%-6% (.05-.06%). Just trying to clear up any confusion, coz I look at these updates, and I am seeing only a very marginal DPS increase to DRK. Like, not even enough to actually look forward to.

0.5 As in less than 1% of a difference. So if you were doing 3000, you now do 3015.

[Aniya_Estlihn]

Someone did the math on Reddit and apparently the dps increase is extremely minimal, like 0.5/6% increase in DPS total lol. Paladins get a 1.6/7% nerf but overall are still going to output more DPS than us so... GG Square, basically nothing changed.

Bok's math is wrong. They failed to consider the Haste effect from Blood Weapon which is a damning error on their part as that is going to be one of the largest benefits from the change to delirium. All Bok focused on was the resource gain while outright ignoring the fact we have the potential to gain GCDs from Blood Weapon. It's a buff, albeit a small one, but Bok needs to redo their math before making such bold claims. Simply using the GCD delay for the Genji weapon isn't enough when Blood Weapon itself lowers our GCD, cast times, and recast times by 10%.

[DerpyCubone]

Bok's math is wrong. They failed to consider the Haste effect from Blood Weapon which is a damning error on their part as that is going to be one of the largest benefits from the change to delirium. All Bok focused on was the resource gain while outright ignoring the fact we have the potential to gain GCDs from Blood Weapon. It's a buff, albeit a small one, but Bok needs to redo their math before making such bold claims. Simply using the GCD delay for the Genji weapon isn't enough when Blood Weapon itself lowers our GCD, cast times, and recast times by 10%.

He mentioned the extra GCDs you get in blood weapon. That looks to be in his math

[Pinkie_Pie]

Nothing...changed. Do they not even do their OWN math on their OWN GAME. Blizzard does a better JOB!

[Kalocin]

Nothing...changed. Do they not even do their OWN math on their OWN GAME. Blizzard does a better JOB!

Honestly it's kind of like they're building houses without measuring any wood properly.

[Rufalus]

I like some of the suggestions people have been throwing around. Slight potency increase to Bloodspiller. Reduce or remove mp cost of Dark Passenger. Right? It needed more of a dps gain than it got to make up for lack of utility. Well you could give it utility instead, like Sole Survivor also places a vulnerability up debuff on the target to boost raid dps. If that's too much... I guess an aoe shield mitigation to match the other two tanks?