Results -9 to 0 of 1163

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Krotoan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    3,591
    Character
    Krotoan Argaviel
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Reaper Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Vhailor View Post

    Fix the problem properly, already. Then nobody needs to worry about it ever again.
    All valid concerns and useful suggestions. I've said before it's unlikely they'd put in the resources to actually rework the 2.0 MSQ dungeons but this doesn't mean I don't think they should.
    As you've said it's a general consensus in the forums that SE will outright refuse to do anything extensive on old content. The reasons for this have never truly been disclosed or defined other than we know they operate on "limited resources". Now whether or not that means manpower, budget, or time nobody here knows. It could even possibly just be a cop out and they have other reasons entirely they do not wish to disclose, but I'd like to think we're not there.

    Lets say this current situation is because they have limited manpower as an example though. Knowing this, and knowing that they'd have to divert some of this to rework the MSQ into a solo instance with NPC's with appropriate waypoints, tactics and prompts, would you support a delay in current content to get this done? Or are you of the mind that since they're pulling in money at all , more should be spent on expanding the resources available to the FFXIV team to make this kind of change happen? As in the sacrifice here needs to be wholly absorbed by the company.

    I ask this a lot because I hear many people say "oh they just need to.. " but once you propose a cost for that to happen they immediately balk and say how it "just needs to get done and should have been done long ago. ". Personally I don't think we're "owed" anything since the game has been and continues to be worth the subscription I pay, but I suppose others do not see it that way.

    I'm also curious if you're on the "revert the change , too much negative impact was made" side or do you think even with the negatives at least some progress was made that warrants keeping the change around? Barring people who like to argue and flap away everything said as a labeled argument fallacy I really do want to hear an opinion. You seem like you've put a lot of thought into it, what's your take?
    (3)
    Last edited by Krotoan; 02-19-2018 at 10:24 PM.