Please Reconsider MSQ Changes

[linay]

I still maintain that ilvl scaling to 110 was a mistake. It should be 50-60. Then we can talk about skipping cutscenes.

That wouldn't stop people kicking those who don't want to skip. In fact, it would make them want to kick more because they would want a party that go at their pace to help them.

With the way it is now, those who want to go ahead can start on the fight and those who wait patiently can join in if the fight has not concluded.

[Kaethra]

That wouldn't stop people kicking those who don't want to skip. In fact, it would make them want to kick more because they would want a party that go at their pace to help them.

With the way it is now, those who want to go ahead can start on the fight and those who wait patiently can join in if the fight has not concluded.

Kicking for difference in playstyle is allowed and not even an issue here.

Right now they can kick new players out of retaliation for the fix. In fact if they started doing this, it would likely grant the change the OP is requesting. Becareful of the topics you bring up.

[linay]

Kicking for difference in playstyle is allowed and not even an issue here.

Right now they can kick new players out of retaliation for the fix. In fact if they started doing this, it would likely grant the change the OP is requesting. Becareful of the topics you bring up.

But how many people would actually kick out of spite for SE over the many people who would kick due to party reason? I think the latter would be more. (if not kick, then harass)

[Gralna]

Kicking for difference in playstyle is allowed and not even an issue here.

Right now they can kick new players out of retaliation for the fix. In fact if they started doing this, it would likely grant the change the OP is requesting. Becareful of the topics you bring up.

Have yet to see a GM quantify this stance since TOS changes last Feb.

◆Offensive expression
"Offensive expression" means an expression in general that inflicts emotional distress by being offensive to another person. Offensive expression may include:

・Aggressive expressions such as violent language/slander/insult/threat.
・Expressions that provoke or belittle another person, such as excessive criticism, negation/ridicule
・Expressions that significantly lack consideration for another person
・Expressions that unilaterally reject another person's opinion
・Expressions that any reasonable person would find offensive
・Expressions that compel a playing style
・Expressions that attempt to unilaterally exclude someone from the game or content/community, etc.
(Except when in accordance with rules set by an administrator such as a Free Company Master)
・Expressions that contravene public order and morals
・Other expressions that are offensive to another person

Offensive expressions are prohibited in all places where expressions can be made in Final Fantasy XIV, including chat (including Quick Chat and Emote), markers, comments and names. Use of an offensive expression in the form of a character name is also regarded as nuisance behaviour.

◆Obstruction of play
"Obstruction of play" means all behaviour in general that obstructs another person's game play. Below is a non-exhaustive list of examples of obstruction of play:

・Spamming
This means using chat (including Quick Chat and Emote) to obstruct another person's conversation, or obstruct the use of mog letters, etc., for example, by sending an excessive number of unnecessary items in mog letters, etc. Even if obstruction was not the objective of the behaviour, it may be deemed a violation if another player is actually obstructed by the behaviour.

・Obstructing transit/progress
This means obstructive behaviour such as group blocking of passages or facilities along which many players pass or obstructing another person's game play progress, for example by overlapping an important NPC deliberately for a long time.

・Improper expulsion voting
This means excluding another person by manipulation of expulsion voting.

・Intentional leaving or disconnection
This means obstructing another person's game play by intentionally leaving the game or disconnecting from the server.

・Other obstruction of play
This means all other behaviour that deliberately obstructs another person's game play by some means.

[Iscah]

That wouldn't stop people kicking those who don't want to skip. In fact, it would make them want to kick more because they would want a party that go at their pace to help them.

With the way it is now, those who want to go ahead can start on the fight and those who wait patiently can join in if the fight has not concluded.

With the way it is now, nobody should be going ahead, and can rightfully be reported for doing so.

[Fynlar]

I still maintain that ilvl scaling to 110 was a mistake. It should be 50-60. Then we can talk about skipping cutscenes.

What do you mean? There is no ilvl sync on CM/Prae.

Unless they've mentioned this as an impending change come 5.0 or something.

[HyoMinPark]

What do you mean? There is no ilvl sync on CM/Prae.

Unless they've mentioned this as an impending change come 5.0 or something.

It syncs you to level 50, which also syncs your stats to the maximum you could have at that level. Which would make the item level roughly 130~135, as that was the highest gear one could get at the end of ARR.

[Kuroka]

It is, youre at 100+ not on like 50 as you would be, thats why its so faceroll. with half the players watching CS ppl would reconsider to ignore new players and rush and pull.

That roulet is solely there for new ppl doing the story, if its too long for you, dont to it. It never was supposed to be burned in 20 min... Its do or do not, there is no try, i mean, skip.

[Liam_Harper]

That roulet is solely there for new ppl doing the story

This is true and unfortunately what people didn't realize.

Castrum and Prae are big epic storyline dungeons for new players. The whole reason the roulette exists is to help the new players get a group and the reason they offer so many tomes is to reward players for helping out the new guys.

Unfortunately what happened was players saw it as a daily exp boost they were entitled to and kicked, ignored or left behind the newbies the entire thing was designed for, before snatching the "thanks for helping the new guy" reward and walking off. It's sad that Enix saw no choice but to literally force players to let the newbies enjoy their dungeon, but you can absolutely blame the players who said "we can kick who we like, it doesn't break ToS, difference in playstyle, watch it in the inn". Just because something isn't bannable, it doesn't mean it's fine. It created an issue that eventually required the devs to take measures and they did. There's a lesson to be learned here.

[Mistyregions]

This is true and unfortunately what people didn't realize.

Castrum and Prae are big epic storyline dungeons for new players. The whole reason the roulette exists is to help the new players get a group and the reason they offer so many tomes is to reward players for helping out the new guys.

Unfortunately what happened was players saw it as a daily exp boost they were entitled to and kicked, ignored or left behind the newbies the entire thing was designed for, before snatching the "thanks for helping the new guy" reward and walking off. It's sad that Enix saw no choice but to literally force players to let the newbies enjoy their dungeon, but you can absolutely blame the players who said "we can kick who we like, it doesn't break ToS, difference in playstyle, watch it in the inn". Just because something isn't bannable, it doesn't mean it's fine. It created an issue that eventually required the devs to take measures and they did. There's a lesson to be learned here.

The true nature of a person shows when there are no tangible repercussions for their actions.