Thread: Patch 4.2 Notes (Preliminary)

Originally Posted by Zojha

Egh. With flying being a thing, mounts that can't do it aren't a viable choice and less desired and since they are used as an incentive for activity X and Y, that means you need to make them able to fly to keep the incentives intact, no matter how silly it might be.

I expect the silliness to escalate further unless they find a way to make ground only mounts viable for travel after flying is unlocked.

I'm not complaining about the flying itself, I'm complaining about the lack of any thought into how the mount should fly. As I said, fenrir, adamantoise, and kirin were all given extra mechanisms that explain their flight (as was the magitek armor mount), whereas christmas bear just floats with no partical effects or any kind of indication of the magic that holds him up. If the horses got wings like kirin, I would be totally on board, but it looks like we are just getting mounts that walk on thin air.

This is a poor extension of the answer to how all mounts can swim... "because magic".

Originally Posted by AxlStream

How about the magic of Christmas?

Exactly, I want to SEE the magic of Christmas, there is so much wasted potential for the flying version of the bear.

Originally Posted by ErryK

I think you're just trying to find reasons to complain purely to complain.

If you say so buddy. Enjoy your noclip horse, however I will look at it in disgust.

Originally Posted by Lambdafish

If you say so buddy. Enjoy your noclip horse, however I will look at it in disgust.

Lol, ok? You seem pretty salty.

Originally Posted by Lambdafish

I'm not salty, I'm just laughing that my legitimate opinion is being countered by the non-argument of "you're just trying to find reasons to complain purely to complain," hence my dismissal of it. Disagree with me if you like, but that's the wrong way to argue your point.

Wrong way? I just find it a non issue because it's a fantasy game where anything can happen. Not everything needs reason or rhyme, especially not here on the OF to begin with either. {/shrug}

Originally Posted by hynaku

How about they take away 30 potency from your healing spells then lets call it a small change. Because going from 100 potency to 70 is a lot when tri-bond is needed for large pulls. That is like almost loosing 1/3 of its potency.

"Needed" SMNs were doing fine with original Tri-Bind when doing AoE. It only needed to be buffed now due to gimped Bane because of Scholar. Everyone is crying murder because SMN was doing more than SAM and now you want to cry about SAM doing too much? Lol? SMN will be fine, Tri-Bind still does more than it used to. I'm not even going to grace the healer change with a proper argument because that's just a stupid change.