Request for clarification from the GM team

[RokkuEkkusu]

These loopholes are the reasons why I favor a function of moving parties of the blacklisted people in the same or similar manner locked duties are. That meaning on the very end of the party finder list.

[Risvertasashi]

Or, don't be a snitch, and move on.

Did you really just tell me "don't be a snitch" about RMT activity? Are you for real?

Yeah, I'm not going to report someone parsing so they can self improve. Botting, RMT, and so on are an entirely different league. IMO the people doing the latter very much deserve any ban they might get. Albeit the sad reality is it is unlikely.

[Sakuraluna]

Snip.

You're putting words into my mouth here. I never said that, wasn't even trying to be rude to you. Maybe I completely misunderstood what you meant by your last post, but it read to me like that was the message you were trying to convey to me tbh. Not sure what your point with this thread is anymore. If you want to report them for possible rmt, report, and if you don't, then don't. No need to get into a circular argument with me when you've already said you didn't want to report them. If that is truly the case, then leave it be.

For reference, this is what I was attempting to address:

The problem is how many there are. Reporting them all would be rather spammy, and I don't want to waste my time

And at that point, I was merely agreeing with you that there's little we can do on a personal level to ban every single example of this type of rmt that pops up in PF. And as I stated in my last reply, I initially thought you were asking about the specific PF entry you posted at the beginning of the thread.

Edit; I don't call names, and never set out to be rude or ugly to other people, that just isn't me. But looking back on the thread, you jumped through quite some hoop there to quote someone else's words and put my name on it whether that was intentional or not. And if it wasn't your intent, then I'll respect that and apologize, but it really had me confused for a bit.

[Nimue]

Use some common sense.
Or, don't be a snitch, and move on.

That being said - cross-server or not - the player could have a large FC with alts on other servers to collect gil payments.
The fact is we don't know - and we can't know - and GM approval is NOT required to report something.

The fact that there are no actual RMT sites posting in the data center makes it clear that they can certainly keep these kinds of advertisement out. There is nothing wrong with restricting end game clearing for payment to world party finder only and should be this way! I know for a fact that some of them do charge real money for players not on their server so finding excuses as to how they might have an alt account on your server is highly unlikely that they would accept payment this way. I would like some clarification from a GM on what SE really thinks about this matter.

[Risvertasashi]

You're putting words into my mouth here.

I'm not quite sure how the misquote happened. Probably multiquote weirdness but I wasn't trying to respond to you anyways. So for that I apologize. Post fixed.

[Sakuraluna]

I'm not quite sure how the misquote happened. Probably multiquote weirdness but I wasn't trying to respond to you anyways. So for that I apologize. Post fixed.

Np, I'm sorry I took offense to it. It happens sometimes.