And I've responded, civilly, to things that I had further comments on. So let's steer well clear of ad-hominems.
I'm sorry, but we've seen enough to know where we stand. We absolutely have. I've also been a patron of Squaresoft/Square Enix for more than twenty years, so I feel that I know about what I can expect from them. What I know/feel/expect/insertwordhere:You will never NEED to support resellers, you seem to be scared that when this new system we've not seen the full details of comes into play your friends will have even less of a chance of getting houses.
1.) FCs, people that already have houses, and resellers with two and a half weeks worth of dummy FC prep time get unrestricted first crack at housing with a confirmed date and time
2.) Anyone that does not qualify for Point #1 has to wait. They do not currently, and judging by Christmas 2015 will not period, have a confirmed date nor time when they can join
3.) Auto-demolition is turned off. If you do not buy from a reseller, or for some inexplicable reason someone relinquishes their plot, you have no avenue to qualify for Point #1
To me, it's cut and dry. If you wish to gamble on some eleventh hour hail mary, that's fine.
...Yes? I'm once again very confused where we're going here. Are we not all just out for our own (read: ourselves and our friends/family)?It seems we see where your line is: "When there is a threat to my interests."
And now you're encouraging the entire playerbase to "go out and get yours".
I don't especially care if people here heed my advice/warning, but as I've stated in a previous post I'm pretty insulted by the details Square has given us thus far and feel an obligation - as seen by having more posts in this thread than anyone else - to at least try and give some people a heads-up.
The price already went up. Square is "playing dirty" insofar that they've legitimately broken their singular promise of making 4.2's house adjustment be fair. Remind me again what's fair about locking people out of housing because they don't already have a plot, and punishing them by not even having the common decency to give them a date or time alongside the one given to FCs/relocators.I don't claim moral superiority, but I'm not the one saying a company is playing dirty and then buying from the thieves because hey, the price might go up soon.
And resellers aren't "thieves." They didn't steal houses from people, they competed alongside everyone else (or bought from other, lowballing resellers) and earned/won them. You may call semantics, but, it's ultimately true.
I'm sure it'll be drowned out by the forums being blasted to high heaven, but sure, bookmark it and we can contrast accuracy levels FOR SCIENCE! when the dust settles.We'll see 2 weeks from now if the situation gets better or worse. I'll gladly revisit this and post where I was wrong and what could have been improved.