Results 1 to 10 of 233

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Aniise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Crystarium
    Posts
    384
    Character
    Nhaama Kagon
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 95
    As someone who owns just one personal and just one FC house, I would find it extremely unfair to take ppls houses away which they have owned before the rulechanges. Especially on alts.
    And no, I'm not talking about the ones who buy like ten houses to sell them off again. I'm talking about normal people who just love decorating and housing and have worked hard for their houses and spend time working on them.

    I dunno, just taking them away would feel so...wrong. :/
    (5)

  2. #2
    Player
    BlackironTarkus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    104
    Character
    Jin Karasu
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    As someone who owns just one personal and just one FC house, I would find it extremely unfair to take ppls houses away which they have owned before the rulechanges. Especially on alts.
    Until the # of plots exceeds the # of personal players needing housing and the # of FC's needing housing it's literally barring a direct in game amount of power from what could be considered 2nd class characters. Gardening can only be done with a property and provides a means to make gil unavailable to the average player. FCs require a house to do airship missions, which have become increasingly important and directly linked to being able to engage on the harder difficulties of the expedition missions. What's unfair is people owning more than one house in these circumstances. Pay the owners gil worth the plot and unrecoverable assets and let them pick which house they want to keep.
    (4)

  3. #3
    Player
    Aniise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Crystarium
    Posts
    384
    Character
    Nhaama Kagon
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 95
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackironTarkus View Post
    What's unfair is people owning more than one house in these circumstances. Pay the owners gil worth the plot and unrecoverable assets and let them pick which house they want to keep.
    I understand where you are coming from, belive me. But those poeple WERE allowed to purchase multiple houses and maybe didn't think anything bad of it, since it was in their good right and it's what brings them joy.
    Back in the day, housing was much more expensive and it took a lot more work to afford a house.. while now, almost everyone can gain enough Gil to buy one just for the sake of "fairness".

    You might be able to compensate the worth of the plot with enough Gil but what about the time and care that went into the houses? I know how invested some people are in stuff like that and I belive that it will make them really sad to give something up they've probably owned for a long time.
    (7)
    Me too, Erenville, me too

  4. #4
    Player
    BlackironTarkus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    104
    Character
    Jin Karasu
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    You might be able to compensate the worth of the plot with enough Gil but what about the time and care that went into the houses? I know how invested some people are in stuff like that and I belive that it will make them really sad to give something up they've probably owned for a long time.
    If they don't remove houses from people who own multiples when these rules go live or have a system in place to force relinquish you are left with a core group of 'elite' service accounts who are objectively better than any service account who does not own more than 1 house, because housing in this game is directly tied to power. Until they add a universal gardening plot somewhere and an airship hangar where anyone can perform these activities regardless of being homeless or not, these elite service accounts are actively hurting the community and barring players from content they could do if they owned a house.
    (9)

  5. #5
    Player
    Aniise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Crystarium
    Posts
    384
    Character
    Nhaama Kagon
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 95
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackironTarkus View Post
    If they don't remove houses from people who own multiples when these rules go live or have a system in place to force relinquish you are left with a core group of 'elite' service accounts who are objectively better than any service account who does not own more than 1 house, because housing in this game is directly tied to power. Until they add a universal gardening plot somewhere and an airship hangar where anyone can perform these activities regardless of being homeless or not, these elite service accounts are actively hurting the community and barring players from content they could do if they owned a house.
    Nah, I think your approach on this might be a bit too agressive, not to be rude. Or maybe it's better to say that it seems that you look only at the facts while I try to take emotional factors into account.

    But...housing is tied to power? How exactly? You mean as some kind of status symbol? Or just because of the gardening stuff?
    I honestly belive they _will_ add gardening to appartements in the future though, again for those famous 'fairness' purposes. But while this is just one of my stupid hopes, I still think as mean as it may sound to you, that it should be handeled 'first come, first served'.

    The fact that poeple could own more that one house existed since they decided to implement personal housing. So, it existed for years. And I don't think it will throw the balance off as much as you think it will. But again...you can just say those are simply my assumptions. (Also sorry for my english, it's not my mother tounge and I hope you can still understand where I'm coming from with this)
    (5)
    Last edited by Aniise; 01-19-2018 at 10:41 PM.
    Me too, Erenville, me too

  6. #6
    Player
    Sairys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    184
    Character
    Senu'a Retkha
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    Nah, I think your approach on this might be a bit too agressive, not to be rude. Or maybe it's better to say that it seems that you look only at the facts while I try to take emotional factors into account.
    I mean, the issue with the emotional factors you're taking into account is that they only those of the people that have been benefitting from the current system, and in turn you're arguing that they should continue to benefit.

    The other side is that for every person that talks about the joy they've had decorating their second or third house (or their practically private ward), there is a group of people upset about the housing situation. People that want to experience that who are locked out.

    There are FCs that want to get a house to get the benefits they convey for an FC, but that group of people is being told that they need to suck it up because someone really needs to have a cute library for their scholar alt while their warrior needs a trophy den. Because the one player would feel sad if they lost their two houses?
    But somehow that one person is more important than the group of people that are frustrated/upset/angry?

    Realistically, forcing people down to 1/1 is simple utilitarianism if you want to get ethical. It's the greatest good for the greatest number of people, it might suck for some, but it's going to be good for more people.
    (6)
    Last edited by Sairys; 01-19-2018 at 10:59 PM.

  7. #7
    Player
    Aniise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Crystarium
    Posts
    384
    Character
    Nhaama Kagon
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 95
    Quote Originally Posted by Sairys View Post
    There are FCs that want to get a house to get the benefits they convey for an FC, but that group of people is being told that they need to suck it up because someone really needs to have a cute library for their scholar alt while their warrior needs a trophy den. Because the one player would feel sad if they lost their two houses?
    But somehow that one person is more important than the group of people that are frustrated/upset/angry?
    I never stated that I thought that one group was more important that the other one. Sadly, with the housing system it's just like I said, 'first come, first served'. As hard as that may sound. But it would be the same the other way around.

    Imagine that scholar who dreams of his 'own cute library' and really wants it, prepared for it and gathered all the money by himself, but gets outrun by that FC that prepared aswell. In that case that scholar need to suck it up just as well.
    You wouldn't want to tell the FC that they have to give up their house for the benefit of the scholar, right? Then, why do it the other way around? Because the scholar already has another house, or an appartement, or a room in his FC's house? They both had the same chance of getting a house in this case. The other party was just a tad more lucky. Who are we to say who deserves it more?

    Sadly that's what housing is in FFXIV. To change this, the _whole_ system would need a complete change that would probably result in taking all houses away, and install instanced housing or something like that, and I guarantee you that there would be a big uproar if they suddenly decided to do this.

    Long story short, I just can't stand behind the idea of taking things from people they have owned for a while just 'for the greater good of the majority'. In my eyes it's plainly wrong, while in your eyes it might just be the best choice they can make at this point. I guess we just stand on different moral points there.

    Edit: Also, with the new system added, it's almost guaranteed that each FC who wants a house will get one. Even the ones with less then 4 people; all they have to do is recruit a few players beforehand which isn't that much work tbh. :P
    (2)
    Last edited by Aniise; 01-19-2018 at 11:21 PM.