Page 12 of 24 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 14 22 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 231
  1. #111
    Player
    Dragonrage53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    44
    Character
    Crysta Moonshine
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Rogue Lv 61
    Honestly I have a single house one small lot, I had it all decorated neatly and creatively I almost never used it. Tonight I realized this and emptied the thing out moved back into my apartment, and posted a greeting similar to this "Yes this house is empty Yes this lot will get released AFTER the 4.2 patch. NO I will not reserve it for anyone best of luck." This is one lot that will not get into the hands of house hoarders, lot flippers or anyone besides someone who genuinely wants a house that does not have one already. I find this whole "but without my empty houses I feel empty" udder nonsense, go to Wildstar if you like housing that much you'll enjoy it much better. Let them squirm, but also know This whole fiasco is on SE not anyone else for not setting clear limits on housing ownership in the first place. Those that abused these lack of restrictions are simply a sad statistic and unnecessary victim pool that in the end that will continue to haunt this games housing system for possibly years....
    (3)
    Last edited by Dragonrage53; 01-21-2018 at 02:02 PM. Reason: clearing deadwood

  2. #112
    Player
    AriesMouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    255
    Character
    Rosalyn Marietta
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 86
    Quote Originally Posted by MaikoRaines View Post
    And it's that whole narrow-minded white knight mentality that I think it's funny you can justify two people owning an entire ward. It's one thing it being 3 or 4 houses, but think back to some of the comments and reasonings why they did it.
    My biggest issue with people crying about the Ward 12 pair, is that those same people are completely content to ignore the dozens upon dozens of people that own houses, and do nothing at all with them, and that isn't even counting house flippers.Hate them as much as you want for having obtained something great, while breaking no rules, but you can't ever say that they aren't doing anything with that ward. Every house they have finished decorating has been made open to the public, and they openly encourage people to visit them, to host events in them, and to RP in those houses ( I've spent over 6 hours doing just that with my FC over the last couple evenings. ) They are also frequently editing the decorations, updating and changing things. The ward itself is like a living breathing organism, every week you could go through and find something new or different, and as someone who is actually on the server with that ward(Most the people I see complaining, surprisingly don't have Mateus marked as their realm on here), I can say it would honestly be a tragedy to lose it.

    That being said, I feel like they should focus more on addressing issues with house flippers, or people just holding onto houses, but doing literally nothing with them, beyond just running inside once a month to reset the auto demo timer. And before anyone comes at me with the "You have no right to say how people should use their houses", when it is dealing with such a finite resource like this, yes, yes people can say how that finite resource should be used, and people do all the time, like those screaming about multi-home owners. I would much rather see 2 people own an entire ward, and actually do something with it, than see the mass of people owning 1 house, and doing nothing with it.

    I think a good balance would be to, at least going forward, put a price on buying houses for alts. Similar to getting retainers, add a higher fee to a person's subscription if they want to own more than one personal home, that way, they are literally helping to pay for the resources it takes to maintain the housing system.
    (5)
    Last edited by AriesMouse; 01-21-2018 at 06:53 PM. Reason: text limit

  3. #113
    Player
    Sairys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    184
    Character
    Senu'a Retkha
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Brynne View Post
    It's still easy, because you can temporarily leave any other FCs and rejoin once the house is bought. My understanding is that the restrictions only apply to purchases, not joining FCs.

    I'm hoping the restriction would be that the person who makes the actual purchase cannot be a member of another FC with a house on any other character, and not that if any member of the FC is a member of another FC with a house on any other character, the purchase cannot be made. Can you imagine the witch hunt within FCs for that? Would it tell you which member it was when you tried to purchase? What if it was someone who quit the game? Would you have to keep kicking random people until it lets you purchase? This would be a horrible design that's still easy to get around for anyone who wants to exploit it but potentially maddening for honest FCs who just happen to have one rogue member.


    *shrug* the translation I was reading said they mentioned that it does apply to everyone in the fc. Which does reflect an expectation that a unique account will only have access to one personal and one fc house per world.

    It sucks, but realistically these measures are only going in because the current system doesn't work and people have run with that as far as they possibly could.

    The fact that it could be easy to get around seems like it's more a case that we'll end up with another housing rework if people do take advantage of that. Or that maybe the housing website will clarify how it's not as easy as expected to get around.
    (0)

  4. #114
    Player illgot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    241
    Character
    Tanuki Crash
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Sairys View Post
    *shrug*
    What gets me is they are creating all these new rules and opening new wards... and it still doesn't solve the actual problem.

    The only real solution is to make housing instanced. Allow apartments to be converted into houses with yards. Let people pick the size house they want and allow them to upgrade anytime they can afford it.

    Allow FCs to use instanced housing so all FCs can have access to a common meeting ground and crafting chambers.

    No matter how many rules you make, if there are less houses than players, the system is broken especially since a good chunk of content is locked behind owning a house.
    (5)
    Last edited by illgot; 01-21-2018 at 07:33 PM.

  5. #115
    Player
    Alien_Gamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    903
    Character
    Cynehild Westknight
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 96
    Quote Originally Posted by AriesMouse View Post
    And before anyone comes at me with the "You have no right to say how people should use their houses", when it is dealing with such a finite resource like this, yes, yes people can say how that finite resource should be used,
    No, you don't. It doesn't matter how much you like or dislike what someone chooses to do with their house, you do NOT get a say in what they do with it. It doesn't matter if the person just wants it for the cheaper teleport or just for a garden plot, or a stable or even just a place to call theirs, you do NOT get a say in what they do with it.

    That housing is a scarce commodity is irrelevant to this. No player should ever have a say in what another player does with the things they acquire in the game. The only exception to this is harassment and even then you don't get a say beyond reporting it to the GMs and letting them decide.
    (5)

  6. #116
    Player
    Genpai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    10
    Character
    Gen Quickpaw
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Alien_Gamer View Post
    No, you don't. It doesn't matter how much you like or dislike what someone chooses to do with their house, you do NOT get a say in what they do with it. It doesn't matter if the person just wants it for the cheaper teleport or just for a garden plot, or a stable or even just a place to call theirs, you do NOT get a say in what they do with it.

    That housing is a scarce commodity is irrelevant to this. No player should ever have a say in what another player does with the things they acquire in the game. The only exception to this is harassment and even then you don't get a say beyond reporting it to the GMs and letting them decide.
    Still everyone has the right to make their opinion heard about what they THINK should happen to that housing, and that's what happening here, no one is dictating policy, just making suggestions in more, or less, eloquent ways. it's up to the devs if they agree or not.

    So yes, everyone has a right to say what they want, just like you have the right to disagree.
    (4)
    Last edited by Genpai; 01-21-2018 at 09:39 PM. Reason: length

  7. #117
    Player
    Penthea's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    3,664
    Character
    Nettle Creidne
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by AriesMouse View Post
    My biggest issue with people crying about the Ward 12 pair, is that those same people are completely content to ignore the dozens upon dozens of people that own houses, and do nothing at all with them, and that isn't even counting house flippers.Hate them as much as you want for having obtained something great, while breaking no rules, but you can't ever say that they aren't doing anything with that ward. Every house they have finished decorating has been made open to the public, and they openly encourage people to visit them, to host events in them, and to RP in those houses

    I would much rather see 2 people own an entire ward, and actually do something with it, than see the mass of people owning 1 house, and doing nothing with it.
    By your logic a person could take everything at a food stall and as long as they eat it all it's okay because everything is used. Whereas a person who takes any amount but chooses to not eat is in the wrong. The other people who wanted food couldn't give a damn whether another person ate it or not, what matters to them is if they get the chance to have any.

    It is the same with housing in ff. Most players couldn't give a crap if that pair use all their houses or not. What matters to them is their own chances of getting a house.

    Furthermore it cannot be argued that the notorious pair in Mateus are unknowingly depriving many players and fcs of housing. They know exactly what they're doing and how much grief it's causing.

    And well SE have made their opinion on this clear. In 4.2 there will be measures to prevent this sort of thing ever happening again unless players buy several accounts. It's only a matter of time before players are forced to let go of excess houses, likely when all characters on one server will have access to the same private home so that no character suddenly becomes completely homeless.
    (4)
    Last edited by Penthea; 01-22-2018 at 12:29 AM.

  8. #118
    Player
    RisaStoleMyHeart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    3
    Character
    Seulgi Love
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 70
    Doesn't change that housing is designed poorly by SE. Not enough houses, no money-sink, and people being allowed to own multiple houses prior to 4.2. I don't mind people owning a few, but owning an entire ward is just vanity. Who cares if the couple is making use of all the houses they own, when people who have been trying to buy a house for months would equally make use of it.
    (3)

  9. #119
    Player
    Brynne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    397
    Character
    Brynne Lagaao
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Sairys View Post
    It sucks, but realistically these measures are only going in because the current system doesn't work and people have run with that as far as they possibly could.
    Yeah, I'll wait for the housing website to clarify, but I'll repeat my hope that this isn't actually the case. SE seems to have a habit of doing things that inconvenience the general player base who are following the rules and do not actually have material impact on the problem they're trying to combat (see also: being unable to trade with alts, which is supposed to hinder gil-sellers and actually does nothing to them as they use multiple accounts and form FCs to get around it - but it's a pain for regular players who want to play multiple characters and share glamour gear, etc).
    (2)

  10. #120
    Player
    worldofneil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,650
    Character
    Scott Pilgrim
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by MaikoRaines View Post
    Koji told me, to my face that the concept is ridiculous. You know how much server resources goes into a ward?
    I don't know, but I didn't think he worked on their network infrastructure either so I mean him no disrespect, but I would take that as a personal opinion rather than actual fact.
    (1)

Page 12 of 24 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 14 22 ... LastLast