Letter from the Producer LIVE Part XLI discussion

[Raim]

Do you guys think they will retroactively remove houses from people who already horded multiple ones on their accounts?

[Lilseph]

Do you guys think they will retroactively remove houses from people who already horded multiple ones on their accounts?

Don't think so. Unless they receive a notification on their e-mail accounts that they have X days to confirm "what house they want to keep". But I think it's hard to implement. I'd believe that people with multiple houses will keep them.

[Mr_Gyactus]

Do you guys think they will retroactively remove houses from people who already horded multiple ones on their accounts?

Of course, do you realize there are accounts with 3-16 houses?

"Selling account with 16 houses, an achievement no longer obtainable ingame"

They cannot add a (right) rule and don't change things.

[Rokke]

Of course, do you realize there are accounts with 3-16 houses?

"Selling account with 16 houses, an achievement no longer obtainable ingame"

They cannot add a (right) rule and don't change things.

God I hope this is the case. That one couple on Mateus is up to 30 houses :/

[Raim]

Of course, do you realize there are accounts with 3-16 houses?

"Selling account with 16 houses, an achievement no longer obtainable ingame"

They cannot add a (right) rule and don't change things.

Im not defending them, but typically you don't implement rules/laws retroactively. At the time they were breaking no rules. It would be odd to punish them for doing something they had every right to do back then. If so you can imagine a lot of fighting on the forums from housing owners.

[SomeRandomHuman]

Im not defending them, but typically you don't implement rules/laws retroactively. At the time they were breaking no rules. It would be odd to punish them for doing something they had every right to do back then. If so you can imagine a lot of fighting on the forums from housing owners.

SE just has to bite the bullet on it. On mateus 1 person owns an entire ward of houses.

I hope they do retroactively enforce it. It doesn't seem fair to the owner(s) yes, but this is a limit that should've been there since day 1.