This is why this game should'nt get a parse

[Alistaire]

Queue pity party and toxic being overused in 3...2...1...

if the shoe fits...

[LeeraSorlan]

you would need like..3 deaths minimum for you to do lower dps than a tank unless ur tank is some kinda god tier 100% fflogs dudebro elitist guy. seems like the dps were underperforming, deaths or not, they did die, which if its a farm then its expected to ykno..do high dps.

If its a learning/clear then maybe he was out of line...his appproach in general could have been better, but a handful of bad eggs does not make the chicken useless.

[Rokke]

I don't wanna play the devil's advocate but... It's the run that juuuuust got uploaded? The tanks did more DPS than all the actual DPS but the NIN. o-O

popcorn.gif

[ElHeggunte]

I don't understand. I see an idiot being an idiot. He'll be an idiot with or without official parsers. So this is supposed to be a parser deterrent because... why exactly?

[Lazaruz]

I don't understand. I see an idiot being an idiot. He'll be an idiot with or without official parsers. So this is supposed to be a parser deterrent because... why exactly?

Think of it this way. How many toxic assholes are not being toxic just because they're afraid someone will report them for parsing?

[HoodRat]

Think of it this way. How many toxic assholes are not being toxic just because they're afraid someone will report them for parsing?

So wait...are you saying that harassment will no longer be a punishable offense if SE adds an official parser?

[Bourne_Endeavor]

Think of it this way. How many toxic assholes are not being toxic just because they're afraid someone will report them for parsing?

About the same amount of toxic assholes who don't use parses yet have no qualms blaming the healer, tank or decrying how bad everyone else is yet when if you do happen to be running a parse, they're the ones lagging behind? If a person is willing to be an antagonistic, they don't need a parse. I know someone who simply says, "Does someone need to me link job guides?" That's passive aggressive at its finest. Hell, if you want to call someone out you just claim you've "watched their rotation" and voila. No mention of parses.

Once again, if GMs do their job and warn/ban toxic people. This wouldn't become an issue.

[HyoMinPark]

Think of it this way. How many toxic assholes are not being toxic just because they're afraid someone will report them for parsing?

Got any proof of those heavy assumptions? How many of these silent players do you think just carry bad players because they don't want to risk getting reported/banned because someone's feelings got hurt, and they automatically take it out on the person who was supposedly parsing instead of looking at what they possibly did wrong (because, remember, bad players do no wrong; everyone else are the mean elitists for not carrying them or putting up with their poor play in farm parties).

[Oscura]

Think of it this way. How many toxic assholes are not being toxic just because they're afraid someone will report them for parsing?

What is with this argument that harassment will suddenly be allowed if parsers are one day condoned?

The two don't go hand in hand, and people will still be banned for harassing others regardless whether or not parsing is "legal."

It's actually getting annoying how people are so desperate to push their narrative that it completely undermines actual harassment.

[Jijifli]

Think of it this way. How many toxic assholes are not being toxic just because they're afraid someone will report them for parsing?

How many people can get away with doing almost nothing because daring to mention it risks you banned for parsing, whether you are or aren't?

There's more to toxic than just parsing someone...