Results -9 to 0 of 67

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Velhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    2,849
    Character
    Velhart Aurion
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Machinist Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by ToxicFox View Post
    I wouldn't waste my time on something if I didn't think it was important.
    !: CS can crash the game. (skipping these CS's seems to make it happen.)
    As a person who's game crashes all the time from overheating (until I changed cards), I never crashed from CS's. While I don't say it doesn't exist, if you believe the issue is big enough to remove the CS's, you are dead wrong.

    2: Being forced to skip a CS or watch it every time I try to go somewhere is a waste of time not to mention the airship has 2 CS's.
    EDIT: Sorry, reading comprehension was off there. What is so bad about dealing with a second of CS to simply skip? It is simply hit the cancel button then hit skip. How is this so inconvenient to your time? Loading screen comes up regardless.

    3: Its a simple enough thing to do and wouldn't take much more time then it takes to make one of these CS's. (Your complain about them spending their time on better things goes out here.)
    The question is, why? Some people enjoy the CS's and you have the option to skip it. Why remove what you don't have to deal with. Optional is the key word.

    4: Offering a toggle would keep everyone happy.
    Going through programming on 1.0 just to make a function to toggle on/off a CS doesn't seem like it is worth it since people are too lazy to hit the cancel button than skip. It sounds like laziness now.

    I am aware number 1 won't always be a problem but I believe fixing the bad coding that is causing the crash will take longer to fix then adding a bypass. Not to mention they are already planning to redo the entire game in 2.0 so it would be pointless to redo the coding for these CS's. In the end this is a temp band aid until 2.0 comes out. If you intend to keep saying its pointless then please leave and don't come back here.
    With optimization supposedly much better in 2.0 and a whole new engine, who knows what will happen when we transit from one thing to another, but why can't you deal with it in 1.0 for now and just see how it is done in 2.0? I have a giant list of things I want changed in 1.0, but I am not putting them all over the forums because I know they are going away and a new system is changing all of it.

    My question is, why should the Dev's put work into something so insignificant that is eventually going to be thrown away to satisfy knit pickers? If your problem is crashing, then simply bring up the fact it is crashing in the tech help section. Bring up the issue with the bug. If you and others are having this issue, then Dev's would eventually see it and possibly fix the issue.
    (1)
    Last edited by Velhart; 01-17-2012 at 01:24 PM.